Gregory Thomas Guerrissi v. State Of Alaska, 031621 AKWC, 21-0024

Case DateMarch 16, 2021
CourtAlaska
GREGORY THOMAS GUERRISSI, Employee, Claimant,
v.
STATE OF ALASKA, DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION Self Insured Employer, Defendant.
AWCB Decision No. 21-0024
AWCB No. 201902745
Alaska Workers Compensation Board
March 16,2021
.          INTERLOCUTORY DECISION AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION          Employer's December 14, 2020 petition for reconsideration was heard on the written record on February 17, 2021 in Anchorage, AK, a date selected on January 22, 2021. Attorney Keenan Powell represented Gregory Guerrissi (Employee). Assistant Attorney General Adam Franklin represented the State of Alaska, Department of Transportation (Employer). A second independent medical evaluation (SIME) was ordered in Guerrissi v. State of Alaska, AWCB Decision No. 20-0013 (March 16, 2020) (Guerrissi I). Guerrissi v. State of Alaska, AWCB Decision No. 20-0109, (December 4, 2020) (Guerrissi II) granted in part and denied in part Employee's petition to strike medical records unrelated to his work injury from the SIME binders. Guerrissi II awarded Employee partial attorney fees based on his prevailing in part on his petition to strike medical records. The record closed at the hearing's conclusion on February 17,2021.          ISSUE          Employer contends the attorney fee award in Guerrissi II should be reconsidered because the Board failed to follow the Alaska Supreme Court decisions in Adamson v. University of Alaska, 819 P.2d 886 (Alaska 1991), Childs v. Copper Valley Electrical Association, 860 P.2d 1184 (Alaska 1993) and Sulkosky v. Morrison-Knudsen, 919 P.2d 158 (Alaska 1996).          Employee contends Employer's argument that attorney fees may only be awarded following a final decision on a claim is not supported by statute, regulation or case law.          Should Guerrissi II's attorney fees award be reconsidered?          FINDINGS OF FACT          All facts and factual conclusions from Guerrissi II are incorporated herein by reference. A preponderance of the evidence establishes the following additional facts and factual conclusions:          1) Guerrissi II was issued December 4, 2020, making the following order concerning attorney fees:          4) Employer shall pay $4,000.00 in attorney fees. (Guerrissi II at 20).          2) On December 14, 2020, Employer timely filed a reconsideration petition for only Guerrissi II order four above.          3) On December 31, 2020 Guerrissi v. State of Alaska, AWCB Decision No. 20-0120 (Guerrissi III) was issued granting reconsideration of Guerrissi II on the attorney fee issue only and directing the parties to file memorandums presenting their positions no later than January 22, 2021. (Guerrissi III at 4.)          PRINCIPLES OF LAW          AS 01.05.006. Adoption of Alaska Statutes; notes, headings and references not law.          The bulk formal revision of the laws of Alaska which was authorized by AS 24.20.070 and prepared under the direction of the Alaska Legislative Council and published by The Michie Company, legal publishers, of Charlottesville, Virginia, and titled "Alaska Statutes," as set out in the 47 titles of the Alaska Statutes, but not including the table of contents, indexes, citations to Alaska Compiled Laws Annotated, 1949, and session laws, chapter, article, section, subsection, and paragraph headings, annotations, collateral references, notes, and decisions, is adopted and enacted as the general and permanent law of Alaska.          In DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp., 63 P.3d 272 (Alaska 2003) the Court found the Board had erred in applying a clear and convincing standard of proof to an employer's claim for reimbursement of benefits based on fraud under AS 23.30.250(b), which is entitled "[P]enalties for fraudulent or misleading acts; damages in civil actions." The Court stated the standard of proof in administrative hearings is the preponderance of the evidence, and, citing AS 01.05.006, although the caption of AS 23.30.250(b) mentions "penalties," captions are not part of the statute and no penalties are in fact assessed. The only remedy under AS 23.30.250(b) is restitution and reimbursement. (Id. at 280.)          AS 23.30.008. Powers and duties of the commission, (a) The commission shall be the exclusive and final authority for the hearing and determination of all questions of law and fact arising under this chapter in those matters that have been appealed to the commission, except for an appeal to the Alaska Supreme Court.... On any matter taken to the commission, the decision of the commission is final and conclusive, unless appealed to the Alaska Supreme Court, and shall stand in lieu of the order of the board from which the appeal was taken. Unless reversed by the Alaska Supreme Court, decisions of the commission have the force of legal precedent.          AS 23.30.108. Prehearings on Discovery Matters; Objections to Requests for Release of Information; Sanctions for Noncompliance.          (d) If the employee files a petition seeking a protective order to recover medical and rehabilitation information that has been provided but is not related to the employee's injury, and the board or the board's designee grants the protective order, the board or the board's designee granting the protective order shall direct the division, the board, the commission, and the parties to return to the employee, as soon as practicable following the issuance of the protective order, all medical          and rehabilitation information, including copies, in their possession that is unrelated to the employee's injury under the protective order.          AS 23.30.145. Attorney fees.          (a) Fees for legal services rendered in respect to a claim are not valid unless approved by the board, and the fees may not be less than 25 percent on the first $1,000 of compensation or part of the first $1,000 of compensation, and 10 percent of all sums in excess of $1,000 of compensation. When the board advises that a claim has been controverted, in whole or in part, the board may direct that the fees for legal services be paid by the employer or carrier in addition to compensation awarded; the fees may be allowed only on the amount of compensation controverted and awarded. When the board advises that a claim has not been controverted, but further advises that bona fide legal services have been rendered in respect to the claim, then the board shall direct the payment of the fees out of the compensation awarded. In determining the amount of fees the board shall take into consideration the nature, length, and complexity of the services performed, transportation charges, and the benefits resulting from the services to the compensation beneficiaries.          (b) If an employer fails to file timely notice of controversy or fails to pay compensation or medical and related benefits within 15 days after it becomes due or otherwise resists the payment of compensation or medical and related benefits and if the claimant has employed an attorney in the successful prosecution of the claim, the board shall make an award to reimburse the claimant for the costs in the proceedings, including reasonable attorney fees. The award is in addition to the compensation or medical and related benefits ordered.          The board may base its decision on not only direct testimony, medical findings, and other tangible evidence, but also on the board's "experience, judgment, observations, unique or peculiar facts of the case, and inferences drawn from all of the above." Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Rogers & Babler, 1A1 P.2d 528, 533-34 (Alaska 1987).          Wise Mechanical Contractors v. Bignell, 718 P.2d 971, 974-75 (Alaska 1986), held attorney fees should be reasonable and fully compensatory, considering the contingency nature of representing injured...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT