Haaland v. Trinity Health Corporation, 030320 IAWC, 5062844

Case DateMarch 03, 2020
CourtIowa
LISA HAALAND, Claimant
v.
TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION d/b/a MERCY MEDICAL CENTER -NORTH IOWA, Employer, Self-Insured, Defendant.
No. 5062844
Iowa Workers Compensation
Before the Iowa Workers' Compensation Commissioner
March 3, 2020
         Head Notes: 1100; 1402.30; 1801; 1803; 2501; 2502; 2907; 4000; 5-9998           APPEAL DECISION           JOSEPH S. CORTESE II WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER          Claimant Lisa Haaland appeals from an arbitration decision filed on January 2, 2019. Defendant Trinity Health Corporation d/b/a Mercy Medical Center - North Iowa, self-insured employer, responds to the appeal. The case was heard on November 3, 2017, and it was considered fully submitted in front of the deputy workers' compensation commissioner on December 15, 2017.          In the arbitration decision, the deputy commissioner found claimant failed to carry her burden of proof to establish she sustained a neurological injury arising out of and in the course of her employment with defendant. The deputy commissioner found claimant failed to prove her cervical condition was causally related to her work duties with defendant. The deputy commissioner found claimant failed to prove her left shoulder condition was causally related to her work duties with defendant. As such, no temporary, permanency, medical, or penalty benefits were awarded to claimant. Lastly, the deputy commissioner found claimant is not entitled to receive reimbursement from defendant for her independent medical examination (IME) or a taxation of claimant's costs.          On appeal, claimant asserts the deputy commissioner erred in failing to find claimant sustained any work-related injuries. Claimant asserts the deputy commissioner erred in failing to find claimant is entitled to receive temporary and permanency benefits, in addition to penalty benefits. Claimant also asserts the deputy commissioner erred in failing to find defendants are responsible for claimant's unpaid medical expenses and for the IME, and in failing to tax defendant with claimant's costs.          I have performed a de novo review of the evidentiary record and the detailed arguments of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT