Ham v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., 112219 SDWC, 67, 2016/17

Case DateNovember 22, 2019
CourtSouth Dakota
David Ham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Timon Wayne Ham, Deceased, and Natalia Elizabeth Bicker, as Guardian Ad Litem of Eli MacPherson Ham, a minor child
v.
Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, a subsidiary or affiliate of AIG Insurance (WC018962552)
HF No. 67, 2016/17
South Dakota Workers Compensation
November 22, 2019
          N. Dean Nasser Nasser Law Offices, PC           William C. Garry Cadwell, Sanford, Deibert & Garry, LLP          RE: HF No. 67, 2016/17 – David Ham, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Timon Wayne Ham, Deceased, and Natalia Elizabeth Bicker, as Guardian Ad Litem of Eli MacPherson Ham, a minor child v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, a subsidiary or affiliate of AIG Insurance (WC018962552)          LETTER DECISION AND ORDER           Michelle M. Faw, Administrative Law Judge.          Dear Mr. Nasser and Mr. Garry,          The Department of Labor & Regulation (Department) has received Claimant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to Determine Weekly Benefit Rate (SDCL 62-4-3) and the response of Employer and Insurer. All submissions have been taken under consideration.          Claimant has moved the Department to determine whether the average weekly wage used to calculate the weekly compensation rate (comp rate) in this matter is $420.17 per week or $373.87 per week. The difference rests on whether a crewmember bonus is included in the calculation. As a crewmember, Timon Ham (Decedent) was eligible for a crewmember bonus in addition to regular pay if the crew, as a whole, reached a productivity level which had been set before the work was performed. Decedent was on a two-man crew with Robert Holman. Claimant argues that the crewmember bonus was part of Decedent’s expected compensation and, therefore, can be included in his comp rate.          Under SDCL 62-1 -1(6), “earnings” is defined as, “the amount of compensation for the number of hours commonly regarded as a day’s work for the employment in which the employee was working at the time of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT