Herron, 081519 OHAGO, AGO 2019-29

Case DateAugust 15, 2019
CourtOhio
The Honorable Robert L. Herron
AGO 2019-29
Opinion No. 2019-029
Ohio Attorney General Opinion
Ohio Attorney General
August 15, 2019
         The Honorable Robert L. Herron          Columbiana County Prosecuting Attorney          Columbiana County Courthouse          105 South Market Street          Lisbon, Ohio 44432          SYLLABUS:          1. A regional water district created under R.C. Chapter 6119, for the purpose of carrying out its appropriate functions, may excavate within a township road or road right-of-way without obtaining a permit which is otherwise required for such excavation under a township resolution adopted pursuant to R.C. 5571.16. The regional water district, however, must otherwise abide by all applicable laws and regulations. Its obligations include under R.C. 6119.06(Z), the duty to restore, repair, or replace any public or private property damaged or destroyed as a result of the district’s activity. Such restoration, repair, or replacement must restore the damaged or destroyed property to its original condition as nearly as practicable. In the alternative, the district may provide compensation adequate to accomplish that end; and          2. A township and its board of trustees enjoy no authority or control over the construction efforts of a regional water district conducted on a township road or within a township road right-of-way. A township may be held liable, however, for injury, death, or loss of person or property caused by the negligent failure of an employee or officer of the township to keep the public roads of the township in repair, or his or her negligent failure to remove obstructions from the public roadways of the township. A board of township trustees is empowered to close a township road to public access and use, temporarily, when the board deems the road to be impassable or dangerous to the traveling public, and its closure necessary to protect the public. Determinations as to the reasonableness of the action reside within the sound discretion of the board of trustees, and are not susceptible to assessment as part of the Attorney General’s opinion-rendering function.          Dear Prosecutor Herron:          You have requested an opinion on the following questions concerning R.C. 5571.16 and R.C. 6119.06:
1. May a regional water district, created pursuant to R.C. Chapter 6119, excavate within a township road or road right-of-way without obtaining a permit to do so from a township that has adopted a resolution requiring such permits under R.C. 5571.16?
2. If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, what then are the duties and responsibilities of the township, if any, to the traveling public utilizing the road during construction?
         You state in your letter that a regional water district (the “district” or the “water district”) is constructing a utility line, part of which will be installed within a township road and/or road right-of-way. The township has adopted a resolution requiring persons wishing to excavate within its roads or road rights-of-way to first obtain from township authorities a permit authorizing such activity. According to your letter, the water district claims that it does not need a permit because it is not a “person” under R.C. 5571.16, and because it is authorized by R.C. 6119.06(Z) and (BB) to act without the township’s consent. You write that the officials of the township do not intend to prevent...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT