Holzschuh v. Mnscu Metro. State Univ., 052019 MNWC, WC18-6231

Case DateMay 20, 2019
CourtMinnesota
BRUCE M. HOLZSCHUH, Employee/Appellant,
v.
MNSCU METRO. STATE UNIV., Self-Insured Employer/Respondent,
and
HARTFORD LIFE, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD MN/BLUE PLUS, and ALLINA MED. CLINIC, Intervenors.
No. WC18-6231
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals
May 20, 2019
         CAUSATION – PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITION. Substantial evidence, including medical records, expert psychological opinion, and lay testimony supported the finding that the employee had failed to prove that he sustained a work-related PTSD condition within the meaning of DSM-5 and the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act.           Jerry W. Sisk and Thomas D. Mottaz, Law Office of Thomas Mottaz, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, for the Appellant.           Richard W. Schmidt and Michael R. Johnson, Cousineau, Waldhauser & Kieselbach, P.A., Mendota Heights, Minnesota, for the Respondent.           Determined by: Patricia J. Milun, Chief Judge, David A. Stofferahn, Judge, Deborah K. Sundquist, Judge           Compensation Judge: Kathleen Behounek          Affirmed.           OPINION           PATRICIA J. MILUN, CHIEF JUDGE.          The employee argues that the compensation judge erred as a matter of law by finding the employee did not sustain a compensable work-related injury on May 17, 2016, in the nature of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as manifested though his anxiety and depression. We conclude that the compensation judge’s findings are supported by substantial evidence, and affirm.          BACKGROUND          Bruce M. Holzschuh, the employee, began working for the self-insured employer, MNSCU Metropolitan State University (MNSCU), as an admissions counselor in 2000. In 2006, he was assigned to create an admissions and transition assistance program for MNSCU applicants and students who were military veterans. After he created the program, MNSCU assigned him to work as the coordinator of veteran student services. In this role, the employee was the program’s sole permanent staff member, assisted by work-study students. The duties of this position involved meeting with veteran students to provide them with guidance and counseling related to their school activities, benefits, and funding. The employee is not a licensed psychologist or health care professional and has no formal training as a psychological counselor; however, he testified that much of his job involved listening to military veteran students discuss the psychological effects they were experiencing from traumatic situations they...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT