Hood v. Maine Department of Corrections, 021318 MEWC, 18-5

Case DateFebruary 13, 2018
CourtMaine
NED E. HOOD (Appellant)
v.
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (Appellee)
Decision No. 18-5
App. Div. No. 16-0055
Maine Workers Compensation Decisions
State of Maine Workers’ Compensation Board
February 13, 2018
          Argued: July 19, 2017           Attorney for Appellant: Benjamin K. Grant, Esq. MCTEAGUE, HIGBEE Four Union Park           Attorneys for Appellee: Anne-Marie L. Storey, Esq. John K. Hamer, Esq. RUDMAN WINCHELL           PANEL MEMBERS: Administrative Law Judges Knopf, Goodnough, and Hirtle           Hirtle, Administrative Law Judge.          [¶1] Ned Hood appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board administrative law judge (Elwin, ALJ) granting, in part, Mr. Hood’s Petition for Award and denying his Petition for Payment of Medical Services regarding an August 28, 2009, work injury. The ALJ adopted the medical opinion of an independent medical examiner appointed pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 312 (Supp. 2017) to find that the effects of Mr. Hood’s respiratory injury ended after approximately one month. Mr. Hood argues that the ALJ erred by failing to make sufficient factual findings concerning how she weighed the medical opinion of a board-appointed medical examiner against other expert opinions. We agree in part and remand the decision for further findings.          I. BACKGROUND          [¶2] Ned Hood suffered a respiratory injury while working for the Department of Corrections on August 28, 2009, when he was exposed to epoxy paint fumes. Following his injury, Mr. Hood continued to work his regular job duties until experiencing chest pain, difficulty breathing, and profuse sweating on December 4, 2014. He has not worked for the Department of Corrections since that time. Mr. Hood then brought the pending petitions and alleged that the lasting effects of his respiratory injury contributed to the symptoms that began on December 4, 2014, and resulted in compensable earning incapacity under the Workers’ Compensation Act.          [¶3] As part of the litigation process, the board referred Mr. Hood to an independent medical examiner pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 312. No motion was made before the examination to disqualify the independent medical examiner.          [¶4] In his report, the examiner opined that Mr. Hood likely suffered a work-related respiratory injury on August 28, 2009, but that the effects of his injury likely resolved by...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT