Horton v. Aspen Waste Systems, Inc., 122420 MNWC, WC20-6356

Case DateDecember 24, 2020
CourtMinnesota
LARRY HORTON, Employee/Appellant,
v.
ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., and EMC INS. COS., Employer-Insurer,
and
C. JEREMY LAGASSE, Respondents.
No. WC20-6356
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals
December 24, 2020
         ATTORNEY FEES – GENUINE DISPUTE. An award of fees from a benefit of the employee that is not yet due and not yet payable is premature. Not until the benefit is payable to the employee can it be determined what role an attorney played in obtaining that benefit for purposes of awarding attorney fees.           Kirk C. Thompson, Kirk C. Thompson Law Office, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the Appellant.           James S. Pikala, Eric S. Schwab, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis Minnesota, C. Jeremy Lagasse, Aaron Ferguson Law, Roseville, Minnesota, for the Respondents.           Determined by: David A. Stofferahn, Judge, Gary M. Hall, Judge, Deborah K. Sundquist, Judge           Compensation Judge: Kirsten M. Tate          Vacated.          OPINION           DAVID A. STOFFERAHN, Judge.          The employee appeals from an award of attorney fees to be paid from his permanent partial disability benefits. There is no evidence that permanent partial disability benefits were payable and it was an error to award an attorney fee from those benefits. We vacate the award.          BACKGROUND          Larry Horton, the employee, sustained a serious work injury on June 22, 2017, which resulted in significant disability affecting his cervical spine, thoracic spine, and right arm. The employer admitted liability and commenced payment of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits and medical expenses.          On the employer’s behalf, the insurance adjuster wrote to the employee’s treating doctor, Dr. Daniel Sipple, on June 22, 2018, seeking a report addressing maximum medical improvement (MMI) and permanent partial disability (PPD) ratings. Dr. Sipple stated in his response of July 10, 2018, that the employee had 10 percent disability for the injury to the cervical spine and 60 percent for the nerve...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT