In re Aegis Communications Group Inc., 102716 NYWC, 00739555

Case DateOctober 27, 2016
CourtNew York
Matter of Aegis Communications Group Inc., Employer
No. 00739555
New York Workers Compensation
October 27, 2016
          Date of Accident: 08/30/2007          District Office: NYC          Carrier: American Home Assurance Co Carrier ID No.: W029003 Carrier Case No.: 709533653          Issue: Workers’ Compensation Law § 15(3)(v) additional compensation           Claimant's Attorney: Howard A Kornfeld Law Offices           MANDATORY FULL BOARD REVIEW FULL BOARD MEMORANDUM OF DECISION           Kenneth J. Munnelly          The Full Board, at its meeting on September 20, 2016, considered the above captioned case for Mandatory Full Board Review of the Board Panel Memorandum of Decision filed April 1, 2016.          ISSUE          The issue presented for Mandatory Full Board Review is whether the claimant is entitled to additional compensation pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law (WCL) § 15(3)(v).          The Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) found claimant is entitled to additional compensation pursuant to WCL § 15(3)(v).          The Board Panel majority affirmed the WCLJ.          The dissenting Board Panel member would find that the claimant's request for additional compensation under WCL § 15(3)(v) is inadequate as the claimant (1) failed to comply with a prior Board Panel direction to produce her social security disability benefits application, and (2) failed to demonstrate her participation in a Board approved rehabilitation program as required by the statute.          In its application for Mandatory Full Board Review filed April 25, 2016, the carrier contends that WCL § 15(3)(v) does not apply because the claimant has not shown that the impairment of her earning capacity is due solely to the compensable injury. In the alternative, the carrier contends that the case should be returned to the trial calendar to develop the record on the proper rate of compensation.          In her rebuttal filed May 19, 2016, the claimant argues that the decision of the Board Panel majority should be affirmed.          Upon review, the Full Board votes to adopt the following findings and conclusions.          FACTS          The claim is established for injuries to the right shoulder and the right elbow sustained on August 30, 2007. In a decision filed on December 6, 2012, the claimant was awarded a 65% schedule loss of use of the right arm, with a protracted healing period of 49.6 weeks. This schedule loss of use award "ran out" on June 30, 2012.          The...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT