In re Compensation of Judd, 042319 ORWC, 17-04145

Case DateApril 23, 2019
CourtOregon
71 Van Natta 441 (2019)
In the Matter of the Compensation of DANIEL F. JUDD, Claimant
WCB No. 17-04145
Oregon Worker Compensation
April 23, 2019
          Julene M Quinn LLC, Claimant Attorneys           SAIF Legal Salem, Defense Attorneys           Reviewing Panel: Members Ousey and Curey.           ORDER ON REVIEW          Claimant requests review of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Pardington’s order that upheld the SAIF Corporation’s denial of claimant’s injury/occupational disease claim for bilateral inguinal hernias and an umbilical hernia. On review, the issue is compensability. We reverse.          FINDINGS OF FACT          We adopt the ALJ’s “Findings of Fact.”          CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OPINION          In upholding SAIF’s denial, the ALJ analyzed the claim as an “occupational disease,” and concluded that the opinion of claimant’s attending surgeon, Dr. Mastrangelo, was insufficient to establish compensability under a “major contributing cause” standard. ORS 656.802(2)(a).          On review, claimant contends that his claim is compensable as either an injury or an occupational disease. For the following reasons, we conclude that the claim is compensable as an injury.          In determining whether a claim is appropriately analyzed as an occupational disease or an injury, we look at whether the onset of the condition itself, not its symptoms, occurred suddenly or gradually. See Smirnoff v. SAIF, 188 Or.App. 438, 443 (2003) (an occupational disease is distinguished from an injury by its gradual onset, whereas an injury arises suddenly due to an identifiable event or has an onset traceable to a discrete period).          Here, on April 5, 2017, claimant was lifting and moving stacks of chairs weighing about 70 pounds when he felt a “catch” and pain in both sides of his pelvis. (Tr. 8-9). Previously, he had no pelvic symptoms. (Tr. 9; Ex. 10-2). Thereafter, he experienced ongoing pelvic pain and a June 8, 2017, ultrasound revealed bilateral inguinal hernias. (Exs. 1-1, 2).          [71 Van Natta 442] During a June 14, 2017, examination, Dr. Mastrangelo diagnosed an umbilical hernia. (Ex. 6-1). Dr. Mastrangelo opined that claimant’s umbilical and bilateral inguinal hernias were caused by his lifting a stack of chairs weighing 75 pounds or more at work on April 5, 2017. (Ex. 14-3).          Under these circumstances, we conclude that the onset of the claimed hernia conditions arose as a result of a traceable event/discrete period. Consequently, we...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT