In re Compensation of Krossman, 071219 ORWC, 17-03354

Case DateJuly 12, 2019
CourtOregon
71 Van Natta 775 (2019)
In the Matter of the Compensation of DEVYNNE C. KROSSMAN, Claimant
WCB No. 17-03354
Oregon Worker Compensation
July 12, 2019
          Ronald A Fontana, Claimant Attorneys           Cummins Goodman et al, Defense Attorneys           Reviewing Panel: Members Curey and Ousey.           ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION          On March 12, 2019, we abated our previous order that awarded a penalty for the self-insured employer’s allegedly unreasonable denial of claimant’s new/omitted medical condition claim for Raynaud’s Syndrome. We took this action to consider the employer’s motion for reconsideration, asserting that the record lacks evidence of any “amounts then due” on which to base a penalty under ORS 656.262(11)(a). In response, claimant contends that an ORS 656.262(11)(a) penalty was appropriately awarded. Claimant also seeks reconsideration of those portions of our order that declined to award an ORS 656.386(1) attorney fee and impose sanctions under ORS 656.390.[1] Having considered the parties’ supplemental arguments, we proceed with our reconsideration.          [71 Van Natta 776] In our previous order, we concluded that the employer’s ongoing denial was unreasonable in light of the changed opinions from Drs. Button, Nolan, and Bell. Thus, we found that claimant was entitled to a penalty under ORS 656.262(11)(a).          On reconsideration, the employer asserts that the ORS 656.262(11)(a) penalty is not awardable because the record does not establish any “amounts then due.” Claimant responds that, based on Walker v. Providence Health Sys. Oregon, 267 Or.App. 87 (2014), such a penalty is awardable in the absence of evidence of “amounts then due.” After further consideration, we conclude that, based on this particular record, an ORS 656.262(11)(a) penalty cannot be assessed. We reason as follows.          ORS 656.262(11)(a) provides for a penalty up to 25 percent of any “amounts then due” if the carrier unreasonably refuses to pay compensation or unreasonably delays the acceptance or denial of a claim. As the proponent of the penalty issue, claimant bears the burden of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT