In re Compensation of Cox, 012821 ORWC, 19-01296

Case DateJanuary 28, 2021
CourtOregon
73 VanNatta 66 (2021)
In the Matter of the Compensation of GERALD W. COX, Claimant
WCB No. 19-01296
Oregon Worker Compensation
January 28, 2021
          Guinn Law Team, Claimant Attorneys           MacColl Busch Sato PC, Defense Attorneys           Reviewing Panel: Members Ousey and Woodford.           ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION          On December 30, 2020, we reversed an Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ's) order that upheld the self-insured employer's denial of claimant's new/omitted medical condition claims for left shoulder subacromial bursitis, impingement syndrome, widening of the coracoclavicular joint, well-corticated ossicle at the joint line, and regrowth of the left distal clavicle resection area. Specifically, we found that Dr. Gordin's opinion persuasively established the compensability of the claimed conditions. Contesting our evaluation of Dr. Gordin's opinion, the employer seeks reconsideration. Based on the following reasoning, we adhere to our prior decision.          The employer contends that Dr. Gordin's opinion was based on an incomplete history because she had not personally reviewed claimant's 1999 imaging (which demonstrated claimant's acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthritis) at the time of her August 2019 examination. However, Dr. Gordin was well aware that claimant suffered from AC joint arthritis in 1999 at the time of her examination. (Ex. 161-1-4,-7,-9-11). Specifically, she reviewed claimant's medical records from 1997 to 2019, noted multiple times in her report that claimant had AC joint arthritis in 1999, and considered his AC joint arthritis in her analysis. (Ex. 161-1-4, -9-12). In addition, Dr. Gordin personally reviewed the seven most recent imaging studies (ranging from 2014 to 2018) and Dr. Farris's and Dr. Hanna's reports, which included their opinions regarding claimant's AC joint arthritis. (Ex. 161-1, -3, -7-8). Further, Dr. Gordin personally reviewed the 1999 imaging before her deposition. (Ex. 162-7). Under such circumstances, we find that Dr. Gordin's opinion was based on a complete history. See Jackson County v. Wehren, 186 Or.App. 555, 561 (2003) (a history is complete if it includes sufficient...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT