In re Petition For A Finding of Failure To Insure Workers’ Compensation Liability, 020421 AKWC, 21-0008

Case DateFebruary 04, 2021
CourtAlaska
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR A FINDING OF THE FAILURE TO INSURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION LIABILITY AND ASSESSMENT OF A CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST, ANGEL AVIATION, INC., Respondent.
AWCB Decision No. 21-0008
AWCB No. 700007570
Alaska Workers Compensation Board
February 4, 2021
         FINAL DECISION AND ORDER           William Soule, Designated Chair          The Division of Workers’ Compensation, Special Investigations Unit’s (Division or SIU) September 30, 2019 petition for failure to insure workers’ compensation liability, and for a civil penalty, was heard on the written record in Anchorage, Alaska on February 3, 2021, a date selected on December 8, 2020. A November 5, 2020 hearing request gave rise to this hearing. Investigator Doug Love represents the SIU. Non-attorney Al Merrill represents Angel Aviation, Inc. (Employer). The record closed at the hearing’s conclusion on February 3, 2021.          ISSUE          The division contends Employer was uninsured for workplace injuries while operating a business with employees in Alaska. It contends, taking all evidence and legal factors into account, Employer should pay an appropriate civil penalty.          Employer does not dispute the Division’s evidence or arguments. However, it contends financial difficulties in the aviation industry and nation in general and its own financial problems militate against a large penalty that could create an unrecoverable financial hardship, associated business closure and lost training opportunities and employment for its clients and employees.          What is an appropriate civil penalty in this case?          FINDINGS OF FACT          The following facts and factual conclusions are undisputed based on Employer’s voluntary discovery responses and its hearing brief, or are established by a preponderance of the evidence:          1) Employer, a corporation formed on May 20, 2017, is an aviation flight school located at Merrill Field in Anchorage, Alaska. It offers aircraft rental and flight instruction for single and multi-engine aircraft. Employer utilizes certified flight instructors who provide flight instruction to student pilots. Its corporate officers include Lucas Merrill, Director; Robin Merrill, Secretary; and Samuel Merrill, President. Each officer is at least a 25 percent or more shareholder. There are no executive officer insurance waivers on file with the Division for Employer’s corporate officers. Employer’s brief states Al Merrill is its president. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits; Employer’s Hearing Brief, January 27, 2021).          2) The division’s undisputed evidence, based on Employer’s discovery responses, shows Employer was uninsured for workplace injuries from July 4, 2017, to October 10, 2019, which equals 828 consecutive uninsured calendar days. Employer had 38 employees during that time and compiled 15,214 employee working hours, which equals 1,901 uninsured employee workdays (15,214 / eight hours per day = 1,901) (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          3) Employer is currently insured with an estimated annual premium totaling $4,323; this equals $11.84 per day to insure against workplace injuries ($4,323 / 365 days = $11.84) (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          4) Based on its current insurance costs, the estimated workers’ compensation insurance premium Employer would have paid had it been insured for the 828 uninsured calendar days is $9,803.52 (828 days x $11.84 = $9,803.52) (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          5) Twice the estimated premium Employer would have paid had it been insured for the 828 uninsured calendar days at issue is $19,607.04 ($9,803.52 x two = $19,607.04) (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          6) Employer has one aggravating factor because it had an uninsured lapse exceeding 180 consecutive calendar days. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          7) The Alaska recorder’s office does not show any outstanding judgments or liens against Employer; other databases do not show any outstanding bankruptcies, judgments or liens against Employer in Alaska or Arizona, the two states where Employer does business. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          8) Employer’s last quarterly report filed with the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development for third-quarter 2020, showed Employer had 19 employees and third-quarter payroll totaling $108,313.86. This payroll is higher than payroll Employer reported in 2019, and in the first two quarters of 2020. Its tax statements show its annual wages for instructors and mechanics for 2017 and 2018, were around $192,199. According to Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development records Employer’s average monthly wages for its employees in Alaska were approximately $26,382 between September 2019 and September 2020, which amounts to $316,584 for the 12-month period. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          9) Employer’s financial statements for 2017, show assets totaling $394,603 with liabilities totaling $1,668,817. Its 2018 assets totaled $277,955 with liabilities totaling $1,880,883. However, in late 2018, Employer assumed $212,066 in new liabilities from the previous year and reduced its assets by $116,648. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          10) Employer’s financial records showed it earned $698,285 in 2017 and $1,453,110 in 2018. However, its 2017 records show a $38,461 net loss. Employer did better in 2018, with a net profit of $113,132; tax returns show its shareholders received no business income in 2017 or 2018. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          11) Employer did not provide updated financial information for 2019 or 2020. (Petitioner’s Brief for Hearing, January 22, 2021, with exhibits).          12) The division seeks an order setting an appropriate civil penalty pursuant to the Act and applicable regulations; it contends the penalty could be as high as $95,050 under this case’s facts. It does not object to a penalty assessed...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT