Ingle, 112114 NMAGO, IAL 11212014

Case DateNovember 21, 2014
CourtNew Mexico
The Honorable Stuart Ingle
IAL 11212014
New Mexico Attorney General Opinion
Attorney General of New Mexico
November 21, 2014
          GARY K. KING, Attorney General           ELIZABETH A. GLENN, Chief Deputy Attorney General          The Honorable Stuart Ingle          New Mexico State Senator          2106 West University Dr.          Portales, New Mexico 88130          Re: Opinion Request - Curry County Detention Center Consulting Agreement          Dear Senator Ingle:          You requested our opinion regarding the legality of a contract between the Curry County Board of County Commissioners ("Commission") and Curry County Sheriff Matt Murray ("Sheriff") for the provision of security and safety consulting services to the administrator of the Curry County Detention Center. As discussed in detail below, we conclude that the contract was not awarded in compliance with the Governmental Conduct Act and raises questions under New Mexico laws precluding a public officer from holding two incompatible positions concurrently.          Background          At its January 8, 2013 meeting, the Commission heard from County Attorney Stephen Doerr regarding the employment contract of Curry County Detention Center Administrator Gerry Billy, and was informed that unless the Commission voted at this meeting to alter the employment contract or issue a notice of termination, Mr. Billy's contract would be extended for two years. January 8, 2013 Commission meeting minutes ("January 8, 2013 minutes"), Book 9, Page 152, lines 23-29. Commissioner Frank Blackburn moved to terminate Mr. Billy's contract, which motion included: "Until a new Detention Center Administrator can be hired, the County Manager will work with the Sheriffs Office to handle the administration of the Adult Detention Center and the Juvenile Detention Center." Id., lines 35-38. The Commission then voted to terminate Mr. Billy's employment contract.[1] The minutes reflect no discussion prior to the motion.          County Manager Lance Pyle informed me that the Commission did not again discuss the Sheriffs involvement in the Detention Center's administration until its May 21, 2013 meeting. At this meeting, Mr. Doerr stated that the Commission had discussed the Detention Center at its January 8, 2013 meeting, specifically, "getting the acting Detention Administrator, the Sheriff, and Manager Pyle working together to run the Detention Center, and that has been the arrangement since that time." May 21, 2013 Commission meeting minutes ("May 21, 2013 minutes"), Book 9, Page 237, lines 41-43 (emphasis added).          Mr. Doerr then presented to the Commission for its approval an Agreement for Consulting Services ("Agreement"), under which the Sheriff would provide "security and safety consulting" to acting Detention Center administrator Tori Sandoval and Mr. Pyle. Id., lines 39-46. While the Agreement stated that the Sheriff had been assisting Ms. Sandoval with the Detention Center's "security, policies and procedures" since January 8, 2013, the Agreement provided that the Sheriff would be paid $3,000.00 per month as of April 1, 2013, the Agreement's effective date. Agreement, p. 1. The Agreement made no mention of any payment to the Sheriff for the period between January 8 and April 1, 2013.          As part of the May 21, 2013 discussion, Commissioner Wendell Bostwick expressed his concern that the Agreement authorized the Sheriff to be paid monies beyond his statutorily-prescribed salary. May 21, 2013 minutes, Book 9, Page 237, lines 47-49. Commissioner Bostwick further noted that among the Sheriffs responsibilities included in the Agreement were his coordination of inmate transportation and his consultation and advice to the acting jail administrator on qualifying inmates for the ankle bracelet program. Commissioner Bostwick stated that the Commission had already appropriated funds to allow the Sheriff and his employees to perform both of these services. Following a brief discussion about the Sheriffs deputies working overtime at the Detention Center, Commissioner Bostwick questioned "whether [the Commission] need[ed] to pay extra money to have the Sheriff be a participant" in the operation and management of the Detention Center. Id., lines 50-52, 56-64; Page 238, lines 2-3.          When...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT