Jaeger v. Cfjjldrens Hosp. & Clinics of Minn., 012021 MNWC, WC20-6352

Case DateJanuary 20, 2021
CourtMinnesota
MARY JAEGER, Employee/Appellant,
v.
CFJJLDRENS HOSP. & CLINICS OF MINN., And BERKLEY RISK ADMR'S CO., INC., Employer-Insurer/Respondents,
No. WC20-6352
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals
January 20, 2021
         ARISFNG OUT OF & IN THE COURSE OF - TRAVELING EMPLOYEE. As the employee did not regularly travel for work and was not traveling away from her regular employment locations at the time of injury, the traveling employee doctrine did not apply to afford workers' compensation coverage.          ARISFNG OUT OF & FN THE COURSE OF - GOING TO AND FROM WORK. Substantial evidence supported the compensation judge's determination that the employee was not between work sites when injured in an automobile accident and therefore the exception to the commuting exclusion did not afford workers' compensation coverage.          ARISFNG OUT OF & FN THE COURSE OF - DUAL PURPOSE TRIP. Substantial evidence supported the compensation judge's determination that the employee was not engaged in a dual purpose trip when injured in an automobile accident and therefore was not in the course of her employment.           Aaron W. Ferguson, Aaron Ferguson Law, Roseville, Minnesota, for the Appellant.           Edward Q. Cassidy Ashley A. Thronson, Fredrikson & Byron, PA., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the Respondents.           Determined by: Sean M. Quinn, Judge Patricia J. Milun, Chief Judge Gary M. Hall, Judge           Compensation Judge: Stacy P. Bouman          OPINION           SEAN M. QUFNN, Judge          The employee appeals the decision of a compensation judge that her injury did not arise out of and in the course of her employment. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          The employee, Mary Jaeger, is a highly trained nurse with an Advanced Practical Registered Nurse degree and a Doctorate in Nursing Practices. She began working for the employer, Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota, in 2008. In 2013, she began working for the employer's Skin Integrity Team. The Skin Integrity Team's primary goal is preventing skin injuries to hospital patients. Children's Hospitals comprises two campuses, one in St. Paul and one in Minneapolis. The employee primarily worked at the Saint Paul campus. Occasionally, the employee would have to drive between campuses and was paid mileage for those journeys.          The employee's job on the Skin Integrity Team was full time, five days a week. She was a salaried employee. Her day typically began around 7:00 or 8:00 a.m. and ended around 4:30 p.m. However, the employee would often work past 4:30 p.m. and sometimes as late as 8:00 p.m. to complete her work. Usually, the employee left the hospital after her charting was completed. Occasionally, the employee would do her charting at home, but this did not occur often. Typically, the employee left the hospital campus after making final rounds and checking with the other nursing professionals to make sure that all of the patients' medical needs were taken care of for the day.          As a member of the Skin Integrity Team, the employee was "on call" every third week. She testified that during their regular working hours, every employee was essentially on call for every patient, but after working hours and on weekends the on-call team member would receive calls and pages and see to it that patients' needs were attended to. However, it was expected that any employee, as a salaried professional in a very specialized care unit, would respond to an after-hours call or page even if not formally on call.          The employee's supervisor testified that although she was a valued member of the Skin Integrity Team, the employee sometimes had issues with completing charting in a timely fashion. This was also documented in the employee's performance reviews.          On Friday, August 9, 2015, the employee had completed her rounds and checked with the other nurses to make sure that all of the patients' needs were satisfied. It was approximately 2:00 p.m. and she decided to leave for the day, saying that she intended to complete her charting at home. As she was walking to her car, she received a phone call from the Minneapolis campus regarding a patient there. Although another member of the Skin Integrity Team was already at the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT