Johnson v. Hall Chevrolet Hartford Underwriters ins Co., 031521 VAWC, VA00001414230

Case DateMarch 15, 2021
CourtVirginia
ALISA JOHNSON
v.
HALL CHEVROLET HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INS CO, Insurance Carrier
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INS CO, Claim Administrator
Jurisdiction Claim No. VA00001414230
Claim Administrator File No. Y66C 82802
Virginia Workers’ Compensation
Virginia In The Workers’ Compensation Commission
March 15, 2021
          Date of Injury: December 9, 2017           Corey R. Pollard, Esquire For the Claimant.           Adam S. Rafal, Esquire For the Defendants.           REVIEW on the record by Commissioner Marshall, Commissioner Newman, and Commissioner Rapaport at Richmond, Virginia.           OPINION           RAPAPORT Commissioner          The defendants request review of the Deputy Commissioner’s October 19, 2020 Opinion finding the claimant proved her left ankle injury was a compensable consequence of her work-related right knee injury, and the defendants were responsible for the requested home modification. We AFFIRM.          I. Material Proceedings          The claimant suffered a compensable injury by accident to her right knee on December 9, 2017. Pursuant to an agreement by the parties, on April 23, 2019, the Commission entered an Award Order providing for medical benefits and temporary total disability benefits beginning November 19, 2018.          On August 26, 2019 and May 12, 2020, the claimant filed claims seeking medical benefits for her left ankle as a compensable consequence and home modification recommended by Dr. Luciano-Perez. The defendants defended the claims on the grounds there was no causal connection between the injury and medical treatment, and the requested medical treatment and modifications were not causally related to the accident.          Deputy Commissioner Jenkins held an evidentiary hearing via WebEx on July 28, 2020. He found the claimant proved her ongoing right knee condition was causally related to her work injury, and she suffered a left ankle injury when she fell as a result of her compensable right knee injury. He also found the recommended home modification to either install a downstairs bathroom or a stair lift was reasonable and necessary, given the claimant’s inability to use the stairs due to frequent falling associated with her ongoing right knee condition.          The defendants request review of the Deputy Commissioner’s Opinion. The defendants contend the Deputy Commissioner erred in finding the left ankle injury was a compensable consequence, and the claimant was entitled to the home modification. They assert Dr. Cohn’s...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT