Kamp, 090883 CAAGO, AGO 83-305
Case Date | September 08, 1983 |
Court | California |
"A county or city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, or other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general law." (See also Gov. Code, § 37100.)Since a city ordinance enacted under this power would be void if it conflicts with general state laws, we must examine the possible conflicts. A conflict may occur (1) if an ordinance duplicates state law, or (2) if an ordinance contradicts state law by prohibiting what state law allows or allowing what state law prohibits. (Lancaster v. Municipal Court (1972) 6 Cal.3d 805, 807-808; In re Lane (1962) 58 Cal.2d 99, 106; Abbott v. City of Los Angeles (1960) 53 Cal.2d 674, 681-682; Doe v. City and County of San Francisco (1982) 136 Cal.App.3d 509, 517-518.) A conflict may also arise where state law has preempted the particular field of law by express declaration or by implication. (Lancaster v. Municipal Court, supra, 6 Cal.3d at 808; Doe v. City and County of San Francisco, supra, 136 Cal.App.3d at 517-518.) Since the proposal would forbid the display of "sex programs" to children without parental presence or prior written permission, we are immediately alerted to the state laws prohibiting the dissemination of "harmful matters" to minors. (Pen. Code, §§ 313-313.4.) Penal Code section 313.1, subdivision (a), provides as follows:
"Every person who, with knowledge that a person is a minor, or who fails to exercise reasonable care in ascertaining the true age of a minor, knowingly distributes, sends, causes to be sent, exhibits, or offers to distribute or exhibit any harmful matter to the minor is guilty of a misdemeanor.""Harmful matter" is defined in Penal Code section 313:
"(a) 'Harmful matter' means matter, taken as a whole, the predominant appeal of which to the average person, applying contemporary standards, is to prurient interest, i.e., a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion, and is patently offensive to the prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material for minors, and is utterly without redeeming social importance for minors. "(1) When it appears from the nature of the matter or the circumstances of its dissemination, distribution or exhibition that it is designed for clearly defined deviant sexual groups, the predominant appeal of the matter shall be judged with reference to its intended recipient group. "(2) In prosecutions under this chapter, where circumstances of production, presentation, sale, dissemination, distribution, or publicity indicate that matter is being commercially exploited by the...
To continue reading
Request your trial