Keliher, 031213 MEAGO, AGO 2013-1

Case DateMarch 12, 2013
CourtMaine
Patrick Keliher, Commissioner
AGO 2013-1
No. 2013-01
Maine Attorney General Opinions
State Of Maine Office Of The Attorney General
March 12, 2013
         Patrick Keliher, Commissioner          Department of Marine Resources          #21 State House Station          Augusta, Maine 04333-0021          Re: Regulation of Saltwater Fishery under the Maine Indian Claims Settlement Acts          Dear Commissioner Keliher:          You have asked this Office for an Opinion regarding the State's regulatory jurisdiction over marine resources, in particular, whether the State has the authority to regulate Passamaquoddy tribal members who take saltwater fish, clams, scallops or elvers, and whether the Maine Indian Tribal-State Commission (MITSC) has a statutory role in resolving questions over saltwater fishing matters involving the Maine tribes. You have also asked about the effect of the 1776 Treaty of Watertown.          A reading of the statutes and the legislative history of the Indian Claims Settlement Acts leads to the conclusion that tribal members are subject to Maine's regulatory authority over marine resources to the same extent as other Maine citizens and that MITSC has no particular authority or role regarding saltwater fishing issues. In addition, the 1776 Treaty of Watertown is irrelevant to the saltwater fishery issues.          State Regulation of the Saltwater Fishery          Those who negotiated and drafted the Indian Claims Settlement Acts dealt directly with natural resources issues, which were a critical component of the negotiations, as fully documented in the legislative history. The issue of whether the tribes were subject to licensing and regulation regarding marine resources has also been addressed by the courts, and the Maine Legislature has exercised its authority in this area to enact statutes affording tribal members privileges not available to other Maine citizens.          Statutes.          The United States Supreme Court has determined that Congress has plenary power to divest tribes of attributes of sovereignty. United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313, 323 (1978). As a result of the lengthy negotiations leading up to the Settlement Acts, and with the agreement of the Maine tribes, Congress specifically extinguished tribal aboriginal claims to Maine's marine resources. Title 30 M.R.S. § 6204 establishes that Maine tribes and their members, lands and natural resources are subject to Maine's civil and criminal jurisdiction...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT