Kendall v. Delphi Automotive Systems, 050104 MIWC, 2006-318
Case Date | May 01, 2004 |
Court | Michigan |
1. The parties are subject to the Michigan compensation laws on the date of injury alleged, 9/27/02.
2. The defendant was self-insured.
3. Plaintiff was in the employ of defendant on the date of injury alleged.
4. Notice was given and claim made according to statute.
5. The gross wage is $1396.47. The appropriate compensation rate is $644.00.
6. There is no dual employment.
7. The tax status is married, filing joint, with 1 dependent, wife Linda.ISSUES:
1. Whether plaintiff met with personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on or about the date alleged, 9/27/02.
2. Whether a disability resulted from the alleged injury.
3. Whether a wage loss has been incurred, and if so, the term and amount of compensation to be paid as a result.
4. Plaintiff’s entitlement to medical expenses and treatment.
5. Whether any benefits were paid or furnished for which coordination or offset would be appropriate under Section 354 or 358.SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE JAMES KENDALL, plaintiff, was born in xxx and is currently a GM retiree. He was employed by GM in the late 1960s and rehired...
To continue reading
Request your trial