Konjuhovac v. University of Vermont, 031621 VTWC, 06-21WC

Case DateMarch 16, 2021
CourtVermont
Elvia Konjuhovac
v.
University of Vermont
Opinion No. 06-21WC
Vermont Workers Compensation Decisions
State of Vermont Department of Labor
March 16, 2021
          Hearing held via Microsoft Teams on November 17, 2020 Record closed on December 21, 2020          State File No. KK-64597           Christopher McVeigh, Esq., for Claimant           David Berman, Esq., for Defendant           By: Stephen W. Brown, Administrative Law Judge          OPINION AND ORDER           Michael A. Harrington Commissioner          ISSUES PRESENTED:          1. Were the spinal surgeries performed by David Lunardini, M.D. reasonable and necessary medical treatment for Claimant’s accepted spinal condition?          2. Is Claimant at end medical result, and if so, as of what date?          EXHIBITS:          Joint Medical Exhibit (“JME”)          Preservation Deposition of David Lunardini, M.D.          FINDINGS OF FACT:          1. I take judicial notice of all relevant forms in the Department’s file for this claim.          2. Claimant is a 49-year-old woman originally from Bosnia. She has lived in the United States since approximately 1997. Since then, she has worked in multiple jobs requiring physical labor at various colleges and universities in Vermont, including Middlebury College, Saint Michael’s College, and most recently, Defendant University of Vermont, which employed her as a custodian. In that capacity, she performed physically demanding work including cleaning, shoveling snow, and carrying trash. This work involved frequent lifting and bending. Between approximately 2016 and May 2018, she was able to perform these activities without significant difficulty.          3. Before May 2018, she was also physically active outside the workplace. She participated in Taekwondo, played basketball, actively gardened and raised chickens, performed household chores, bicycled, and took long walks nearly every day. While Claimant’s medical records reflect some back-related complaints in 2008 (JME 1-3) and 2016 (JME 129-134), there is no evidence that she suffered from any chronic or seriously limiting back pain before May 2018.          4. On May 20, 2018, while working for Defendant, Claimant knelt down to remove three layers of duct tape from a baseboard in a university dormitory, but there were several items of furniture in the way. She moved a dresser toward her and felt pain in her lower back and into her legs. Defendant accepted her lower back injury as compensable and paid some workers’ compensation benefits accordingly.          5. Following her May 2018 injury, Claimant’s physical activity level decreased substantially. Although she could still perform some basic household chores, she could not walk like she used to and increasingly relied on her husband. It also became difficult for her to sleep at night, even after purchasing a new mattress and altering her sleeping position.          6. Claimant has received extensive conservative medical treatments including Lyrica, gabapentin, epidural steroid injections, physical therapy, massage therapy, and pool therapy. Although some of these treatments have provided some relief, she still experienced low back pain, shooting pain into her right leg, and numbness in her right foot.          7. In December 2019, Clarence Ivey, D.O., one of Claimant’s treating physicians who provided her with multiple injections, suggested that surgery might help and referred her to consult with orthopedic surgeon David Lunardini, M.D. (See JME 812-831).          8. Dr. Lunardini first met with Claimant in February 2020. (JME 842). He asked her about her symptoms, conducted a physical examination, and reviewed diagnostic studies including x-rays, an MRI, a SPECT CT scan, and an EMG.          9. Dr. Lunardini advised Claimant that he believed that her pain was related to her L5 nerve root and discussed the possibility of spinal surgery, specifically an L5-S1 laminectomy and right L5 foraminotomy. He advised her that that surgery was intended to improve her leg pain, but that it may or may not improve her numbness or back pain. He expected this surgery to increase Claimant’s functionality by eventually decreasing her pain, and Claimant confirmed that those were acceptable goals to her. (See Lunardini Deposition, pp. 14-15).          10. Dr. Lunardini ultimately performed two spinal surgeries on Claimant, the first as planned on September 29, 2020, and a revision surgery on October 2, 2020. (See JME 842-844; 913-919; see also Findings of Facts Nos. 14-20, infra). These surgeries substantially relieved Claimant’s right leg pain, but she still has low back pain and has some increased right leg numbness.          11. Claimant was still recovering from her surgeries when she testified at the formal hearing. She was in visible discomfort and used a walker.          12. Defendant has denied the compensability of Dr. Lunardini’s surgeries on the grounds that they were not medically reasonable or necessary. Defendant also seeks to discontinue temporary disability benefits on the ground that Claimant reached end medical result in September 2019, before Dr. Lunardini performed the surgeries described above.          Expert Medical Testimony          13. Both parties presented expert medical testimony in support of their respective contentions. Claimant presented Dr. Lunardini as her treating surgeon and Verne Backus, M.D., who performed an independent medical examination (IME) of Claimant on August 24, 2020. Defendant presented Nancy Binter, M.D., who performed an IME of Claimant on August 23, 2019 and supplemented her IME report on March 27, 2020. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT