Kucera v. Kellogg Co., 082807 NEWC, 1541

Case DateAugust 28, 2007
CourtNebraska
PATRICE KUCERA, Plaintiff,
v.
KELLOGG COMPANY, Defendant.
No. 1541
DOC 200
Nebraska Workers Compensation
August 28, 2007
          Richard J. Rensch, Attorney at Law           Charles L. Kuper, Attorney at Law           ORDER           James R. Coe, JUDGE          This matter came on for hearing before the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court on the 3rd day of August, 2007, upon the plaintiff’s motion to enforce award and subsequent orders and the defendant’s response to plaintiff’s motion. The parties appeared, Exhibits A through H were offered by the plaintiff and received, argument was had and the Court, being fully advised in the premises, finds as follows:          I.           The plaintiff’s petition requests payment of continuing medical expenses the plaintiff has allegedly incurred as a result of her accident and injury of August 27, 1999. The defendant has paid all subsequent medical expenses the plaintiff has incurred up until approximately 60 days prior to the date of this hearing. The defendant has denied further medical care stating that an order for future medical expenses was not part of a final award or final judgment citing Green v. Drivers Mgmt., Inc., 263 Neb. 197, 639 N.W.2d (2002) and Thornton v. Grand Island Contract Carriers, 262 Neb. 740, 634 N.W.2d 794 (2001). The defendant further alleges that the plaintiff’s motion does not cite or meet the requirements for future medical expenses that are allowed in a petition for modification pursuant to § 48-141.          II.           On February 21, 2001, a running award was issued by Judge Ramirez in a one paragraph decretal order allowing the plaintiff temporary total disability benefits from August 3, 2000, and continuing until the plaintiff was no longer totally disabled. There were two subsequent orders by the Court. The first was on August 11, 2004, (EC) and had to do with the procedural mechanics about how the plaintiff’s current medical services would be paid as the plaintiff had moved to Michigan. The second and last award by the Court was a further order (ED) dated February 2, 2005, which denied plaintiff’s request...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT