Larsen v. Winco Holdings Inc., 012420 IDWC, IC 2014-020785

Case DateJanuary 24, 2020
CourtIdaho
AMANDA LARSEN, Claimant,
v.
WINCO HOLDINGS INC., Employer,
and
AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Surety, Defendants.
No. IC 2014-020785
Idaho Workers Compensation
Before the Industrial Commission of the State of Idaho
January 24, 2020
         FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, AND ORDER           Thomas P. Baskin, Chairman.          INTRODUCTION          Pursuant to Idaho Code sect; 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above-entitled matter to Referee Alan Taylor, who conducted a hearing in Idaho Falls on. Claimant, Amanda Larsen, was present in person and represented by Guy R. Price, of Pocatello. Defendant Employer, Winco Holdings Inc. (Winco), and Defendant Surety, American Zurich Insurance Company, were represented by David P. Gardner, of Pocatello. The parties presented oral and documentary evidence. Post-hearing depositions were taken and briefs were later submitted. The matter came under advisement on December 18, 2019. The undersigned Commissioners have chosen not to adopt the Referee’s recommendation and hereby issue their own findings of fact, conclusions of law and order.          ISSUE          The issues were narrowed at hearing. The sole issue presented is whether, and to what extent, Claimant is entitled to permanent disability based on all factors.          CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES          All parties acknowledge Claimant suffered an industrial accident on May 18, 2014. Defendants accepted the claim and paid medical, time loss, and permanent impairment benefits. Claimant now asserts she is entitled to permanent disability benefits of 36%. Defendants assert that Claimant is only entitled to permanent disability of 17.8% inclusive of her permanent impairment benefits already paid.          EVIDENCE CONSIDERED          The record in this matter consists of the following:
1. The Industrial Commission legal file;
2. The parties’ joint exhibits 1 through 10, admitted at the hearing.
3. The post-hearing deposition of Delyn Porter, M.A., C.R.C., CIWCS, taken by Defendants on April 24, 2019.
         Claimant’s affidavit attached to Claimant’s Opening Brief filed November 4, 2019, indicates her employment at Winco was terminated post-hearing for what she considers contrived reasons. This affidavit was submitted long after hearing and the close of the evidentiary record in this case and will not be considered. Defendants’ objection thereto is sustained and their motion to strike Claimant’s affidavit is hereby granted. All other outstanding objections are overruled and motions to strike are denied.          FINDINGS OF FACT          1. Claimant was born in 1966. She was 53 years old and resided in Pocatello at the time of the hearing. She is right-handed.          2. Background. Claimant was born and raised in Idaho Falls where she graduated from high school in 1984. She attended Idaho State University for one year. She worked as a hotel front desk clerk and as a cashier at a plumbing business. In approximately 1990, Claimant completed a ten-month cosmetology training program and was certified as a nail technician. Thereafter she manicured nails for three or four years in a salon and then in her own shop until approximately 1995. Claimant then worked as a house painter and later as a part-time inventory clerk.          3. In 2001 Claimant commenced working for Winco. She worked for nine years in the deli department and then ceased her employment at Winco, expecting to move out of state. She did not move, and instead was hired at Moyle Petroleum where she worked as a convenience store cashier and assistant store manager from 2010 until 2012. She prepared to become the store manager.          4. In 2012, Claimant returned to work at Winco as a cashier. She transitioned to grocery floor work and became a floor supervisor and thereafter was promoted to lead clerk on the freight crew. She had no lifting restrictions and regularly lifted cases of canned goods in excess of 50 pounds. As freight crew lead clerk, she was a working supervisor responsible for serving the produce, bulk foods, deli, bakery, and grocery departments. Her goal was to become a Winco store manager.          5. Industrial accident and treatment. On May 18, 2014, Claimant was at work. She slipped on ice on the freezer floor and fell engaging an electric pallet jack that lurched forward yanking her left arm forward as she fell backward to the floor. She experienced immediate left shoulder burning but finished her shift and reported the incident. At the time of her accident, Claimant was working from 40 to 60 hours per week and earning approximately $12.15 per hour.1 She received medical, dental, and vision insurance and participated in Winco’s employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).          6. Claimant continued working her usual shifts but her shoulder pain increased prompting her to seek medical treatment from Nicole Manning, PA-C, on June 10, 2014. Conservative medical treatment, including physical therapy, provided no significant lasting benefit. A left shoulder MRI revealed a left rotator cuff tear. On October 20, 2014, Nathan Richardson, M.D., performed arthroscopic left rotator cuff repair. Claimant experienced ongoing neck pain. She received diagnostic cervical medial branch block and cervical epidural steroid injections for her persisting neck symptoms. After one injection, she developed a staph infection in her left shoulder resulting in the failure of a tendon anchor placed during her first surgery and requiring prompt hospitalization and an arthroscopic left shoulder lavage, debridement, and rotator cuff repair on December 18, 2014. Later Dr. Richardson considered a brachial plexus release; however, Claimant declined the procedure.          7. After recovering from her shoulder surgeries, Claimant returned to work at Winco as a lead clerk. She was terminated by Winco over a timecard dispute, but appealed her termination to a Winco employee board and was reinstated. Due to the friction between Claimant and an assistant manager over the timecard dispute, Claimant elected not to return to her lead clerk position and instead accepted a position at the customer service counter requiring little reaching or lifting and only occasional cashiering.          8. In May 2018, Claimant underwent a total right knee arthroplasty due to non-industrial causes. After recovering she returned to work at Winco with an accomodation allowing her to sit rather than stand constantly at the customer service counter. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT