Lett v. L.A.C.M.T.A., 030504 CAWC, VNO 0378504

Case DateMarch 05, 2004
CourtCalifornia
JOHN LETT, Applicant,
v.
L.A.C.M.T.A.; THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant(s).
Case Nos. VNO 0378504, VNO 0378505, VNO 0382578, VNO 0402513, VNO 0462718
California Workers Compensation Decisions
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board State Of California
March 5, 2004
         OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION          On December 15, 2003, the Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further study the factual and legal issues in this matter, so as to give us a complete understanding of the record and enable us to issue a just and reasoned decision. Having completed our study, we hereby issue our Decision After Reconsideration.          On May 9, 2003, the applicant's deposition was taken by defendant. On May 14, 2003, pursuant to the petition filed by applicant's counsel, the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) issued a conditional order allowing applicant's counsel attorney's fees of $416.60 in accordance with Labor Code section 5710.1          Defendant timely objected to the order on May 22, 2003, contending that it would be an unreasonable exercise of discretion to allow attorney fees when the applicant had not signed and delivered the deposition transcript, and thus, the deposition had not been completed. Defendant also argued as a matter of public policy that Labor Code section 5710 must be interpreted consistent with efforts to eliminate workers' compensation fraud under Insurance Code section 1871.4, and that because Labor Code section 5710 fees were a benefit to the injured worker as opposed to his or her attorney, it was logical to provide that benefit only after the injured worker had completed the deposition. Defendant apparently had no objection as to the monetary amount of the fee requested.          The issue of the Labor Code section 5710 deposition fees proceeded to hearing on July 7, 2003, and following the submission of points and authorities by the parties, the WCJ issued his decision on October 2, 2003. The WCJ determined that there was no legal requirement that an applicant sign his or her deposition transcript prior to allowing reasonable attorney's fees under Labor Code section 5710. Specifically, the WCJ found...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT