Lucena v. Diablo Auto Body, 120700 CAWC, WCK 037874

Case DateDecember 07, 2000
CourtCalifornia
ISIDORO A. LUCENA, Applicant,
v.
DIABLO AUTO BODY; LIBERTY; MUTUAL INSURANCE; SUN VALLEY FORD; GREAT STATES INSURANCE, Defendant(s).
No. WCK 037874
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board State of California
December 7, 2000
         OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION (OPINION AND ORDER VACATING ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION)           Merle C Rabine          On August 7, 2000, we granted defendant's petition for reconsideration of the Order for Payment of Sanctions dated May 16, 2000, in order to allow sufficient opportunity to further study the factual and legal issues in this case. After further review, we hold that where a petition for reconsideration is not verified as required by Labor Code section 5902,1 the petition will ordinarily be dismissed where the petitioner has been given notice of the defect (either by the Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report) of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) or by the respondent's answer) unless, within a reasonable time, the petitioner either: (1) cures the defect; or (2) offers a compelling reason for the lack of verification and respondents are not prejudiced thereby. Therefore, we will vacate our order granting reconsideration and will dismiss the unverified petition for reconsideration.          I.          In the case before us the WCJ found that counsel for defendant, Great States Insurance Company, willfully filed a petition for dismissal unsupported by the medical record known to defendant, thereby causing applicant's counsel to incur expense in taking the time to reply to the totally unsupported petition for dismissal. Great States Insurance Company was therefore ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $100.00 plus reasonable attorney fees to applicant's attorneys for time and expense in preparing their objection to the petition to dismiss.          Defendant filed a timely petition for reconsideration, admitting that the petition for dismissal was filed in error but contending that it had relied upon a statement in a medical report. The defendant also denied that the petition was willfully and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT