Martin, 121117 CTAGO, AGO 2017-9

Case DateDecember 11, 2017
CourtConnecticut
Major General Thaddeus J. Martin, Adjutant General
AGO 2017-9
No. 2017-09
Connecticut Attorney General Opinion
Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut
December 11, 2017
         Major General Thaddeus J. Martin, Adjutant General          Connecticut National Guard          360 Broad Street          Hartford, CT 06105-3795          Dear Major General Martin:          You have requested a formal opinion concerning two matters identified in the State of Connecticut Auditors' Report, Military Department, for the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2012 and 2013 ("Auditors' Report"). First, you have asked whether the requirements under Connecticut General Statutes § 4-37e et seq. pertaining to foundations established for the principal purpose of supporting or improving state agencies or for coordinated emergency recovery purposes apply to the Connecticut National Guard Foundation, Inc. (CNGFI). Second, you have asked whether the authority of the Governor of the State of Connecticut pursuant to the provisions of Connecticut General Statutes §§ 27-9 and 27-10, as delegated to and administered by the Connecticut Military Department (CTMD), is restricted to ordering members of the Connecticut State Guard to active service under the "State Active Duty" (SAD) program only for "emergency situations" as suggested by the Auditors' Report.          We conclude that the CNGFI is not a "foundation" as that term is defined in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-37e et seq., and is, therefore, not subject to the requirements pertaining to foundations established for the principal purpose of supporting or improving state agencies or for coordinated emergency recovery purposes. We further conclude that the authority of the Governor of the State of Connecticut, as delegated to and administered by the CFMD pursuant to the provisions of Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 27-9 and 27-10, is not restricted to ordering members of the Connecticut State Guard to service under the SAD program only for "emergency situations" as suggested by the Auditors' Report.          I. Connecticut National Guard Foundation, Inc.          You have informed us that the CNGFI is a private, nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation and has an independent governing body that is separate from the CTMD. As stated in the CNGFI's charter, the Foundation's primary purpose is to provide need based and educational assistance to members of the Connecticut National Guard, the Connecticut Organized Militia, their families, and Reserve Component Family Readiness Groups (e.g. Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Navy Reserve, and the Marine Corps Reserve). The Foundation raises funds from the general public, corporations, and corporate and governmental employees for temporary financial assistance, scholarships, special projects, and endowment for those needs. Benefits, in the form of clothing, food, medical/surgical aid, and general care and relief, are provided to eligible candidates via an application process. The CTMD provides office space and utilities to the Foundation within the State Armory located at 360 Broad Street in Hartford, Connecticut at no cost, but offers no further support to the CNGFI.          Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-37e(2) defines a "foundation" as "an organization, fund or any other legal entity which is (A) exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or any subsequent corresponding internal revenue code of the United States, as from time to time amended, and (B) established for the principal purpose of receiving or using private funds for charitable, scientific, cultural, educational or related purposes that support or improve a state agency or for coordinated emergency recovery purposes." Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 4-37f through 4-37k set forth specific requirements for both foundations and for the state agencies that they were established to support. These requirements include, among others, the establishment of governing boards for foundations, the annual filing of an updated list of board members, written agreements regarding use of the agency's facilities and resources, reimbursement to state agencies for expenses incurred as a result of foundation operations if the supported agencies would not have otherwise incurred such expenses, periodic audits of foundation accounts, review of audits by the Auditors of Public Accounts, procedures for foundation solicitations, and prohibitions on state officers or employees receiving compensation or anything of value from a foundation without the express approval of a competent authority.          Because you have already informed us that the CNGFI is a tax-exempt organization pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, the only remaining issue for our consideration is whether, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-37e(2)(B), the CNGFI was "established for the principal purpose of receiving or using private funds for charitable, scientific, cultural, educational or related purposes that support or improve [the Connecticut Military Department]." We find that the CNGFI was not so established.          This office previously issued an opinion to the state auditors regarding a similarly situated organization, the Central Connecticut State University (CCSU) Alumni Association, Inc. See Conn. Op. Atty Gen. No. 1992-032, 1992 WL 532121 (Nov. 23, 1992). That opinion provides a useful analysis for determining whether a specific tax-exempt corporation or organization, such as the CNGFI, is one established for the principal purpose described above. This office reasoned as follows therein:
Distilled to its simplest terms, a "foundation" is a § 501(c)(3) organization whose principal purpose is to receive or use private funds to benefit a state agency. The
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT