Mayner v. General Motors Corp., 030106 MIWC, 2006-392

Case DateMarch 01, 2006
CourtMichigan
ANDREW MAYNER SS # xxx Plaintiff,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORP, SELF-INSURED, Defendant.
No. 2006-392
Michigan Workers Compensation
State of Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth Workers’ Compensation Agency Board of Magistrates
March 1, 2006
         The social security number and dates of birth have been redacted from this opinion.           THE PLAINTIFF Michael P Doud, P 55491, for Plaintiff.           THE DEFENDANTS Thomas Ruth, P 44434, for Defendant.           OPINION           MICHAEL T. HARRIS, MAGISTRATE, 199, JUDGE          THE CLAIM          This claim was originally tried to this Magistrate and an open award resulted. That award and order were mailed by the then Workers & Unemployment Compensation Bureau on 4/10/03. This matter is back before the now Workers Compensation Agency, on a petition filed by plaintiff on 1/24/05, seeking an order concerning the calculation of a proper accrued payment, a penalty for failure to have appropriately paid the benefits, and seeking penalties for failure to pay medical coverage for the work-related condition.          This matter was assigned to Magistrate Harris. However, entry of a new Magistrate into the case rotations in Flint required realignment of the dockets, and this claim was assigned to Magistrate Ambrose, who requested argument and briefs on the issues. Further briefs were prepared in lieu of oral argument. Thereafter, Magistrate Ambrose was reassigned to Lansing, at which time this case was transferred back to Magistrate Harris, before whom it now comes up for decision.          FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW          1. Plaintiff’s petition properly states a claim for medical coverage under the open award issued, and for failure to pay accrued benefits under the open award, in the correct amounts. The application also properly asks for assessment of a penalty for each “violation” in the sum of $1,500.00.          2. Failure or refusal to pay and furnish appropriate medical care for an injured worker who operates under an open award is a serious matter. The time has passed for GM to be able to quibble...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT