McClanahan v. Kellogg’s, 090507 NEWC, 0246

Case DateSeptember 05, 2007
CourtNebraska
DAVE MCCLANAHAN, Plaintiff,
v.
KELLOGG’S, Defendant.
No. 0246
DOC 207
Nebraska Workers Compensation
September 5, 2007
          Michael P. Dowd, Attorney at Law           Charles L. Kuper Paul E. Larson, Attorneys at Law           AWARD           Michael P. Cavel, JUDGE          This cause came on for hearing before the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court at Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, on August 16, 2007, on the pretrial order of August 7, 2007, and on the evidence, Judge Michael P. Cavel, one of the judges of said court, presiding. The plaintiff appeared in person and was represented by counsel. The defendant was represented by counsel. Testimony was taken, evidence adduced, cause submitted, and the Court, being fully advised in the premises, finds:          I.          Although there were objections made during the course of the deposition of Dr. Rich which is before the Court as Exhibit 13, those objections were not itemized and presented to the Court for ruling as required by paragraph III F of the order scheduling the pretrial conference. Accordingly, the Court finds that all objections appearing therein should be overruled.          II.          The parties stipulated, and the Court finds, that Dave McClanahan was employed by Kellogg’s on January 10, 2006, at an average weekly wage of $1,286 and suffered injury to his right knee that date by accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment. As a result of that injury, the plaintiff was temporarily totally disabled for 3 2/7 weeks through May 19, 2006, (with additional temporary disability in dispute) and also suffered a 2 percent permanent impairment to his right leg. The parties stipulated that the plaintiff was paid compensation for 3 2/7 weeks for temporary total disability and Exhibit 38 reflects the plaintiff was also paid for his permanent impairment. The parties have stipulated that the plaintiff is entitled to future medical care reasonable and necessary to treat his right knee injury, to include a right knee MRI. The Court finds those stipulations should be accepted.          III. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT