Moorman v. St. Anthony Health Ctr., 021799 MNWC,

Case DateFebruary 17, 1999
CourtMinnesota
ANITA K. MOORMAN, Employee/Appellant,
v.
ST. ANTHONY HEALTH CTR. and AMERICAN COMPENSATION INS./RTW, INC., Employer-Insurer, and MEDICA CHOICE/HRI, Intervenor.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
February 17, 1999
         HEADNOTES          PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - REMAND; MAXIMUM MEDICAL IMPROVEMENT. As this court is unable to determine the factual basis for the compensation judge's determination that the employee reached MMI as of July 8, 1994, and the compensation judge failed to address the employee's alternative claim that she was medically unable to continue working after August 6, 1997, the appealed findings and conclusions of law are vacated and the matter remanded for redetermination.          PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - REMAND; MEDICAL TREATMENT & EXPENSE. Where the compensation judge failed to explain her determination that the treatment provided by Dr. Holmes was not causally related to the August 14, 1993, injury, and failed to make the findings required by Minn. R. 5221.6050, subp. 7.D., of the permanent treatment parameters, the matter is remanded for a redetermination of the medical causation for, and reasonableness and necessity of, the treatment in dispute.          Vacated and remanded.           Determined by Johnson, J., Wilson, J., and Hefte, J.           Compensation Judge: Carol A. Eckersen           OPINION           THOMAS L. JOHNSON, Judge          The employee appeals from the compensation judge's finding the employee reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) from her August 14, 1993 injury effective July 8, 1994, and was not entitled to temporary total disability benefits from August 6, 1997 through the date of hearing. The employee also appeals from the judge's determination that medical treatment provided by Dr. Holmes from and after May 15, 1997 was not causally related to the work injury, exceeded the treatment parameters and was not reasonable or necessary. We vacate and remand for redetermination.          BACKGROUND          The employee sustained an admitted, work-related injury to her left hip and left leg on August 14, 1993, while working, part-time, as a nursing assistant for the employer, St. Anthony Health Care.1 The employee was treated by Dr. James Keane following the injury. He diagnosed a left hip strain and took the employee off work. In follow-up on August 16, 1993, Dr. Keane noted the employee's left hip pain had intensified and she was unable to stand on her left leg alone. A course of physical therapy was prescribed. On August 20, 1993, Dr. Keane noted the employee had been given crutches by the physical therapist. A lumbar CT scan, an MRI scan of the hip area, x-rays of the left hip and lumbar spine, and a bone scan were negative.          The employee experienced some improvement in her left hip pain and range of motion with physical therapy, and on September 27, 1993, Dr. Keane released the employee to return to work with the employer, two hours a day, seated work only in a reclining position, with no carrying, pulling or pushing, or lifting. The employee continued to receive physical therapy on a daily basis. On October 25, 1993, the employee reported coldness and numbness in the left leg when doing physical therapy exercises. Concerned that the employee might be developing early reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), Dr. Keane referred the employee to an orthopedist, Dr. Orrin Mann, for further evaluation.          Dr. Mann first saw the employee on October 29, 1993. She reported constant stabbing pain in the left hip area, as well some pain in the left buttocks and quadriceps areas and in the low back. She was unable to bear weight on the left leg and was using crutches and occasionally a wheel chair. Dr. Mann was uncertain whether the employee's left leg weakness was the result of a mechanical or musculo-neurologic dysfunction or whether it was secondary to functional overlay, and referred the employee for additional testing.          An independent medical examination (IME) was completed by Dr. John Sherman, an orthopedic surgeon, on November 10, 1993. Dr. Sherman thought the most likely explanation for the employee's symptoms was RSD or possibly a conversion reaction. He recommended an aggressive mobilization and reactivation physical therapy program. Dr. Dorn, a neurologist, examined the employee on November 18, 1993. He concluded the problem was primarily in the hip and ruled out a lumbar spine radiculopathy. He believed the problem might be RSD or some sort of vascular compromise, and recommended against more aggressive therapy until a complete evaluation was done. Subsequent vascular studies were negative. The employee completed an MMPI on November 29, 1993. Psychologist James Gilbertson interpreted the results as showing a "[s]trong suggestion of a conversion profile." (Ex. I.)          Dr. Mann restarted physical therapy in mid-November 1993 which continued through December 1993. On January 6, 1994, Dr. Loran Pilling evaluated the employee, diagnosing a conversion hysteria. The employee completed Dr. Pilling's four-week pain clinic program, followed by additional physical therapy through April 1994. On June 6, 1994, an independent medical examination was performed by Dr. Bruce Van Dyne. Dr. Van Dyne observed the employee had made progress with the recent...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT