Munster v. City of Battle Creek, 062805 MIWC, 2006-351
Case Date | June 28, 2005 |
Court | Michigan |
1 He awarded the plaintiff disability benefits and medical treatment for a 03/03/1997 date of injury.
2 He denied the City’s claim against the SIF on the basis that it was not timely made pursuant to the requirements of MCL 418.925(1) That is, the City failed to comply with the notice provisions required under § 925(1) In doing so, Magistrate Grattan relied on the holding in Robinson v General Motors, 242 Mich.App. 331 (2000)The City’s claim in that earlier case was virtually the same as the one made in the instant application by the City. The course of Magistrate Grattan’s decision on appeal was the...
To continue reading
Request your trial