No. 00-01250 (2002). Land Transportation v. Thompson.
Case Date | March 27, 2002 |
Court | Kentucky |
Kentucky Workers Compensation
2002.
No. 00-01250 (2002).
Land Transportation v. Thompson
LAND
TRANSPORTATION, LLC ROCOR PETITIONER VS. DAVID THOMPSON; UNINSURED EMPLOYERS'
FUND and HON. J. KEVIN KING, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE RESPONDENTSOPINION ENTERED:March 27,
2002CLAIM NO.
00-01250APPEAL FROM HON. J. KEVIN KING,
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE AFFIRMING
* * * * * * BEFORE: LOVAN, Chairman, STANLEY and GARDNER, Members.STANLEY, Member. Land
Transportation, LLC and Rocor ("Land/Rocor") appeal from an opinion and award
rendered November 20, 2001, by Hon. J. Kevin King, Administrative Law Judge
("ALJ"), finding the respondent, David Thompson ("Thompson"), to be an employee
of the petitioner and granting him permanent partial disability benefits based
upon a 9% disability rating. Land/Rocor also appeals from an order issued
December 20, 2001, overruling its petition for reconsideration. On appeal, Land/Rocor argues the ALJ erred in finding Thompson to
be an employee of the petitioner. Rather, Land/Rocor asserts that Thompson was
an independent contractor as a matter of law at the time of his work-related
injury. Consequently, Land/Rocor contends the decision of the ALJ must be
reversed and Thompson's claim dismissed. Having thoroughly reviewed the
evidence of record and applicable law, we find no merit in petitioners'
arguments. We therefore affirm the determination of the ALJ.
Thompson was born on February 25, 1952 and is a resident of
Taylorsville, Spencer County, Kentucky. He has a high school education and a
CDL. Past relevant work experience consists almost exclusively of professional
over-the-road truck driving. Thompson testified he has been driving trucks for
approximately thirty-two years. He has owned his own truck since 1990. Thompson
began driving for Land/Rocor in June 1998.
Thompson and Land/Rocor entered into a formal permanent lease
agreement on July 22, 1998. Under that contract, Thompson agreed to furnish his
tractor/truck "for the exclusive and continuous use" by Land/Rocor. The
agreement was open-ended and according to its terms, operated year-to-year. The
agreement could be terminated, however, by either party upon thirty days
written notice, or immediately in the event either party violated any of the
contract's material provisions. Under the contract, Thompson was required to
maintain all operating licenses; to maintain as his sole costs and expenses any
and all fuel, oil, grease, tires, and other items necessary for the operation
of the equipment; to maintain the equipment in a neat and clean appearance;
and, to pay all mileage based taxes and fuel taxes, highway use fees and road
taxes, tolls, equipment use fees, and driver license fees, etc. Land/Rocor, per
the agreement, was to have exclusive possession, control, and use of Thompson's
truck and was permitted to sublease Thompson's truck to any other authorized
carrier for purposes of transporting such commodities as might be available.
However, Thompson was permitted the right to determine the method, means, and
manner of complying with the terms of the agreement. The agreement further
provided that Land/Rocor "shall exercise every reasonable effort" to furnish
Thompson "as much traffic as is reasonable possible during the duration" of the
agreement.
Additionally under the contract, Thompson was to maintain and
provide workers' compensation coverage and give Land/Rocor a certificate
thereof unless Thompson elected to take advantage of Land/Rocor's "insurance
program." Land/Rocor could make advances to Thompson for this purpose with the
charges to be deducted from monies due the respondent from the petitioner.
Specifically, Land/Rocor deducted a variety of different charges from monies
due and payable to Thompson for purposes of payment of licensing fees,
insurance, etc.
Thompson testified it was his understanding he could not haul for
any companies other than Land/Rocor during the period of his contract. He
stated that although his wages were based upon 70% of the gross revenue per
trip, he was generally paid a weekly salary. He carried his own vehicle
insurance on his truck in case of an on-the-road accident. However, with regard
to workers'...
To continue reading
Request your trial