No. 00643595 (1999). EMPLOYEE: Paul W. Gomes.
Case Date | May 06, 1999 |
Court | Massachusetts |
Massachusetts Workers Compensation
1999.
No. 00643595 (1999).
EMPLOYEE: Paul W. Gomes
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS EMPLOYEE: Paul W. Gomes EMPLOYER: Bristol County
House of Correction
SELF-INSURER: County of Bristol
BOARD NO. 00643595REVIEWING BOARD DECISION (Judges Maze-Rothstein, Levine and Carroll)APPEARANCES
Deborah G. Kohl, Esq., for the employee
Robert M. Novack, Esq., for the self-insurer
MAZE-ROTHSTEIN, J. The self-insurer
appeals from a decision finding it liable for a second period of incapacity
following the employee's injury as he stepped out of his vehicle while not at
work. The self-insurer argues that there was no medical opinion establishing
causal relationship between the employee's initial industrial injury and his
second period of medical disability. We agree, and therefore reverse the
decision.
Paul Gomes had been a correctional officer for 25 years at the
Bristol County House of Correction when, on February 3, 1995, he injured his
right knee in an attempt to cut down and carry away an inmate who was trying to
hang himself. (Dec. 3.) In April of 1995, he had right knee surgery, involving
loss of some of the meniscus. 1 Id. He returned to full duty on June 12, 1995.
2 (Dec. 2.) The self-insurer accepted liability for this injury. Id. Following
his surgery and return to work, the employee felt a lot better and he therefore
stopped treating. (Dec. 4.) However, he continued to feel "twitching and
buckling" in his knee, though it did not cause him to fall down. Id. He also
experienced intermittent "aching," for which he used over-the-counter
medication. Id. Although he never went to the doctor after his return to work,
he could not perform all of his normal activities. Id.
On June 15, 1997, approximately two years after his return to
work, the employee pulled up to his house, got out of his truck and experienced
right knee pain. He limped into his house. (Dec. 3, 5; Tr. 14.) He sought
treatment a few days later, and underwent a second right knee surgery in August
1997. (Dec. 3, 4, 6.)
Mr. Gomes filed a claim for § 34 temporary total incapacity
benefits from June 15, 1997 to November 7, 1997, (Employee Ex. 1), which was
denied at conference. (Dec. 2.) A hearing de novo was held on April 8, 1998.
The only medical evidence consisted of the report and deposition testimony of
the G. L. c. 152, § 11A 3 medical examiner, Dr. VonErtfelda. (Dec. 1, 5.)
The doctor opined that the 1995 injury resulted in a medial meniscus tear,
which was partially removed in surgery. (Joint Ex. 1; Dep. 6, 9-10.) The 1997
incident resulted in another tear of the medial meniscus, but in a different
location, (Joint Ex. 1; Dep. 27); it also caused an anterior cruciate ligament
tear, which had been intact at the time of the work injury. (Joint Ex. 1, 2;
Dep. 22.) The § 11A physician stated that he could not say with any degree
of medical certainty that there was a relationship between the employee's work
injury of 1995 and his post-June 1997 medical disability. (Joint Ex. 1, 2; Dep.
14-16, 17-18, 31-32.) Instead, he attributed the employee's present symptoms to
degenerative changes in the knee, which had been present at the time of the
first injury. (Joint Ex. 1, 2; Dep. 7, 17, 18.)
The judge credited the employee's...
To continue reading
Request your trial