No. 01624895 (1999). EMPLOYEE: James Moskovis.
Case Date | September 17, 1999 |
Court | Massachusetts |
Massachusetts Workers Compensation
1999.
No. 01624895 (1999).
EMPLOYEE: James Moskovis
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS EMPLOYEE: James Moskovis EMPLOYER: Polaroid
Corporation INSURER: Polaroid CorporationBOARD NO. 01624895REVIEWING BOARD DECISION (Judges Smith, Wilson and McCarthy)APPEARANCES
Mark H. Likoff, Esq., for the employee at hearing
Arthur G. Zack, Esq., for the employee on appeal
David L. Cronin, Esq., for the self-insurer at hearing
Timothy F. Nevils, Esq., for the self-insurer on
appeal
SMITH, J. The employee appeals the
decision of an administrative judge denying and dismissing his claim for
further weekly compensation benefits, but ordering reasonable, necessary and
causally related medical, hospital and psychological services. The employee
argues that the judge's decision adopting the opinion of the impartial
examiner, a neurologist, over that of the employee's examining
neuropsychologist was arbitrary and capricious. We disagree, and therefore
affirm the decision.
James Moskovis was a 46 year-old high school graduate with three
semesters of college at the time of the hearing. (Dec. 3.) In 1978, he began
working for the employer, first as a laborer, and later as a security guard, a
materials handler, and a machinist. In 1995, he became senior materials
coordinator, a job that required him to monitor and prioritize the delivery of
materials to and from the employer's warehouse. He helped unload trucks,
lifting up to fifty pounds regularly, and also performed some work on the
computer and handled paperwork involved with deliveries and shipping. (Dec. 4.)
On Friday, April 28, 1995, Moskovis was pulling a materials cart
out of a freight elevator when the overhead gate on the elevator came down and
struck him on the back of the head. (Dec. 4.) Dazed and shaken, he nevertheless
finished his day's work, and then went to the employer's medical clinic. (Dec.
4-5.) He returned to work on Monday, May 1, but began experiencing pain in his
neck, head and jaw and had to leave after a few hours. He sought medical
treatment from his primary care physician, an orthopedic surgeon and a
neurologist. He was out of work for four months, until September 1, 1995, when
he returned to work for the employer, initially part-time and eventually
full-time. (Dec. 5.) The employee filed a claim for weekly incapacity benefits.
Following a § 10A conference, the self-insurer was ordered to pay a closed
period of compensation, ending October 31, 1995. Neither party appealed that
order. (Dec. 1.)
On February 29, 1996, the employee filed the pending claim for
further compensation. On December 18, 1996, after conference, the self-insurer
was ordered to pay § 35 benefits based on the employee's actual earnings
from December 14, 1995 until November 10, 1996 when he left work, and $200 per
week thereafter. Both parties appealed to a hearing de novo. (Dec. 1.) At
hearing, Moskovis claimed § 35 benefits from November 1, 1995 until
November 10, 1996; § 34 benefits from November 11, 1996 until October 27,
1997; and ongoing § 35 benefits. (Dec. 2.)
Pursuant to G.L. c. 152, § 11A(2), Moskovis underwent an
impartial medical examination. The report of an impartial physician, Dr. Locke,
was admitted into evidence. The judge found the case to be medically complex
and allowed the parties to submit additional medical evidence. (Dec. 2.)
After hearing, the judge made the following factual findings:
After his return to work in September 1995, Moskovis worked for over a year,
until November 10, 1996. For much of this time, he was in charge of operations
at the automatic warehouse on the night shift, working essentially as a
production supervisor, performing lighter work than he had done prior to his
injury. (Dec. 5.) During this period between September 1995 and November 1996...
To continue reading
Request your trial