No. 02805997 (1999). EMPLOYEE: Thomas F. Chalifoux.

Case DateAugust 19, 1999
CourtMassachusetts
Massachusetts Workers Compensation 1999. No. 02805997 (1999). EMPLOYEE: Thomas F. Chalifoux COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS EMPLOYEE: Thomas F. Chalifoux EMPLOYER: United Parcel Service INSURER: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.BOARD NO. 02805997REVIEWING BOARD DECISION (Judges Wilson, McCarthy and Smith)APPEARANCES Michelle K. Manners, Esq., for the employee Patricia M. Vachereau, Esq., for the insurer WILSON, J. The employee, who appeals from an administrative judge's denial of his claim for penalties under §14(1), contends that the insurer unreasonably defended the claim. Finding no error, we affirm the decision. The case was submitted to the administrative judge on an agreed statement of facts. Thomas Chalifoux, a package truck driver for UPS, reported to his supervisor on July 31, 1997 that he had injured his hip. The employer forwarded a First Report of Injury form to its insurer on August 1, 1997. That same day the insurer's adjuster called the employee's home, but the employee was unavailable, and the adjuster spoke with his wife about the claim. On August 4, 1997, the insurer contacted the office of the employee's physician, Dr. Lobovits, and was informed that on August 1 the doctor had seen the employee but the dictation was not yet prepared. (Dec. 2.) The insurer requested that the information be sent to it when complete. On August 5, an insurer representative met with the employee and received a signed authorization to obtain information. The insurer again contacted Dr. Lobovits' office on August 7, but was unable to get any additional information. On or about the same day, the insurer completed an Insurer's Notification of Denial form and forwarded it to the employee. (Dec. 3) The denial specified: No Personal Injury. Witnesses and documents dispute that the employee sustained an injury. No Injury Arising Out of and in the Course of Employment. Injury was not caused by an incident of the employment. No Disability. No medical reports have been received to substantiate a disability. No Causal Relation Between Personal Injury and Disability. Disability, if any, was caused by a non-employment source. (Joint Exhibit D.) The insurer once more contacted Dr. Lobovits' office on August 11, 1997, and learned that the employee was to have a bone scan that day. Three days later, the insurer again contacted Dr. Lobovits' office in an attempt to obtain the results of the bone scan, but was told that the report was not yet in. On September 9, 1997, the employee forwarded his claim (Form 110) and the medical reports of his attending physician to the insurer. About two days later, the insurer prepared an Insurer's Notification of Denial (Form 104), listing the same defenses as in its original denial. (Dec. 3, Joint Exhibit H.) The insurer received the results of the employee's bone scan on September 16, 1997, and then scheduled the employee for a medical examination by Dr. John Duff on September 30, 1997. As the employee requested that the examination be rescheduled, it was not held until October 22, 1997. Meanwhile, a conciliation was held on October 8, 1997. Upon receipt of the report of Dr. Duff's examination, the insurer requested an addendum with reference to his opinion on causal relationship, which it...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT