No. 05165692 (1999). EMPLOYEE: Harry Sherr.
Case Date | February 17, 1999 |
Court | Massachusetts |
Massachusetts Workers Compensation
1999.
No. 05165692 (1999).
EMPLOYEE: Harry Sherr
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS EMPLOYEE: Harry Sherr EMPLOYER: City of Peabody
INSURER: City of PeabodyBOARD NO. 05165692REVIEWING
BOARD DECISION (Judges Smith,
McCarthy and Wilson)APPEARANCES
Ronald L. St. Pierre, Esq., for the employee
Daniel Kulak, Esq., for the self-insurer
Smith, J. The municipal self-insurer appeals a decision awarding
more than fourteen years of retroactive § 34A permanent and total
incapacity benefits. The decision did not credit the accidental disability
retirement payments that the City had paid the employee. In this case of first
impression, we discuss the coordination of benefits between the workers'
compensation system, G.L. c. 152, and the contributory retirement system for
public employees, G.L. c. 32. Because G.L. c. 32, § 14(2) places the
ultimate responsibility for preventing a double recovery on the City, and the
City did not avail itself of the statutory remedies provided by c. 152 and c.
32, we affirm the decision not to subtract the pension benefits from the
workers' compensation award.
On January 28, 1977, Harry Sherr sustained an industrial injury
to his lower back arising out of and in the course of his employment for the
City of Peabody. The City, being self-insured, accepted liability for the
injury, and paid § 34 temporary total incapacity benefits from the date of
injury until their exhaustion on December 22, 1982. (Dec. 5.) Around that time,
Sherr applied for and received accidental disability retirement benefits
pursuant to G.L. c. 32.
Over ten years after retiring, on January 25 1993, Sherr filed
the present claim for additional workers' compensation. (Dec. 7.) He claimed
§ 34A permanent and total incapacity benefits from December 23 1982, the
date by when he had exhausted all the temporary compensation benefits that the
law provided. By the time his case reached hearing, Sherr was eighty-two (82)
years old. (Dec. 6.) After hearing, the judge concluded that Sherr was entitled
to the workers' compensation benefits that he claimed, without any offset for
the accidental disability retirement benefits that he had been paid over the
prior fourteen plus years. (Dec. 18.)
The City appeals to the reviewing board, complaining that it is
being made to pay twice for the same injury. It asserts that Sherr's claim
should be time barred by the equitable doctrine of laches. The City's complaint
has great superficial merit because the law abhors a double recovery for the
same injury or loss. Pierce's Case, 325 Mass. 649, 658-659 (1950) (no workers'
compensation for the same period during which employment security benefits
paid); Mizrahi's Case, 320 Mass. 733, 737-738 (1947) (no compensation under
G.L. c. 152 and under the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act
for the same period of total incapacity); McLaughlin's Case, 274 Mass. 217, 222
(1931) (New Hampshire workers' compensation benefits...
To continue reading
Request your trial