No. 07779991 (1999). EMPLOYEE: Stanley Kowalczyk.

Case DateSeptember 17, 1999
CourtMassachusetts
Massachusetts Workers Compensation 1999. No. 07779991 (1999). EMPLOYEE: Stanley Kowalczyk COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS EMPLOYEE: Stanley Kowalczyk EMPLOYER: Morgan Construction Co. INSURER: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.BOARD NO. 07779991REVIEWING BOARD DECISION (Judges McCarthy, Wilson and Smith)APPEARANCES Charles W. Dixon, Esq., for the employee Patricia A. Costigan, Esq., for the insurer MCCARTHY, J. Stanley Kowalczyk filed a claim for payment under § 36 of the Act for loss of function of the low back. The insurer resisted the claim denying, among other things, that the employee suffered a back injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. After a conference on the claim held under § 10A of the Act, the assigned administrative judge denied the claim. The employee filed a timely appeal. Because this was a case involving a dispute over a medical issue, the appealing party was obliged to pay a fee to defray the cost of the impartial medical examination required by §11A: When any claim or complaint involving a dispute over medical issues is the subject of an appeal of a conference order pursuant to § 10A . . . [t]he insurer or any claimant represented by counsel who files such an appeal shall also submit a fee equal to the average weekly wage in the commonwealth at the time of the appeal to defray the cost of the [impartial] medical examination under this section within ten days of filing said appeal. . . ." [1] Notwithstanding the failure to perfect the appeal, the case was assigned back to the same administrative judge for a hearing under § 11. The administrative judge rejected the insurer's argument that he lacked jurisdiction to hold a hearing and, on July 7, 1998, filed a hearing decision in which he found that the employee had not submitted the requisite $350.00 appeal fee and thus had not perfected his appeal. The judge went on to order that the claim be dismissed without prejudice and pointed out that Kowalczyk could refile the claim if he so desired. We have the case on the insurer's appeal from that decision. The insurer argues that the judge exceeded his authority by holding a hearing and filing a decision when the claim was not properly before him. We...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT