No. DM-0384 (1996).
Case Date | April 19, 1996 |
Court | Texas |
Texas Attorney General Opinions
1996.
No. DM-0384 (1996).
April 19, 1996Opinion No. DM-384Morales Opinion No. DM-384
Office of the Attorney General State of TexasThe Honorable John Vance Dallas County District
Attorney 411 Elm Street Dallas, Texas 75202The Honorable Hardy L. Wilkerson Howard County
Attorney P.O. Box 2096 Big Spring, Texas 79721SYLLABUS: 1996-0384Re:
Whether sections 1.045 and 1.07(a)(1) of the Family Code, requiring an
applicant for a marriage license to state under oath that he or she does not
owe delinquent court-ordered child support, violate the Equal Protection Clause
of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
(RQ-862)Dear Mr. Vance and Mr. Wilkerson:
You ask about the constitutionality of sections 1.045 and
1.07(a)(1) of the Family Code. These provisions require an applicant for a
marriage license to submit a sworn statement that he or she does not owe
delinquent court- ordered child support. Newly enacted section 1.045 provides
as follows:
(a) An applicant for a marriage license shall submit to the
county clerk a statement witnessed by two credible persons and verified before
a person authorized to take oaths stating that as of the date the application
for a marriage license is filed the applicant does not owe delinquent
court-ordered child support.
(b) A child support payment is considered delinquent for purposes
of Subsection (a) if the child support obligee under a child support order that
applies to the applicant is entitled to seek enforcement of an arrearage under
Subchapter B, Chapter 14.
(c) A person commits an offense if, with intent to deceive and
with knowledge of the statement's meaning, the person submits a false statement
under this section.
(d) An offense under this section is a state jail felony.
Act of May 26, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 655, § 5.04, 1995
Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 3543, 3559. At the same time the legislature enacted the
foregoing provision, it also amended section 1.07(a)(1) of the Family Code,
which establishes the conditions under which a county clerk may issue a
marriage license. Id. § 5.05. That section now provides that a county
clerk may not issue a marriage license if either applicant fails to provide the
information required by section 1.045. See Fam. Code § 1.07(a)(1).
You express concern that the foregoing provisions violate the
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution, citing Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978). In that case,
the United States Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Wisconsin
statute that prohibited certain persons, namely every Wisconsin resident
"having minor issue not in his custody and which he is under obligation to
support by any court order or judgment," from obtaining a marriage license
without a court order. Id. at 375 & n.1. The statute provided that a court
order giving permission could be granted only if the marriage applicant
submitted proof of compliance with the support obligation and demonstrated that
the children covered by the order "[were] not then and [were] not likely
thereafter to become public charges." Id. The opinion of the Court, after
affirming that the right to marry is fundamental, id...
To continue reading
Request your trial