No. JC-0558 (2002).
Case Date | September 20, 2002 |
Court | Texas |
Texas Attorney General Opinions
2002.
No. JC-0558 (2002).
September 20, 2002Opinion No. JC-0558Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0558 (2002) -- John Cornyn
AdministrationOffice of the Attorney General - State
of Texas John CornynThe Honorable Frank
Madla Chair, Intergovernmental Relations Committee
Texas State Senate P.O. Box 12068 Austin, Texas
78711-2068SYLLABUS: 2002-
Re: Whether a provision of the nepotism statute prohibits a city
commissioner from deliberating on a merit salary increase for his sibling, and
related question (RQ-0532-JC)
Dear Senator Madla:
You request an opinion regarding the application of a provision
of the nepotism statute, chapter 573 of the Government Code, to a member of the
governing body of a home-rule city. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann.
ch. 573 (Vernon 1994 & Supp. 2002). You ask whether a city commissioner
violates section 573.062(b) of the Government Code by participating in a
deliberation regarding a merit salary increase for the commissioner's sibling,
a long-time city employee. (1) See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §
573.062(b) (Vernon 1994) (pertaining to continuous employment). You also ask
whether the other city commissioners would violate any criminal statutes if
they vote to approve the salary increase after involvement in the earlier
nepotistic deliberation regarding the salary increase. See
Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.
We conclude that section 573.062(b) of the Government Code
prohibits a city commissioner from participating in a deliberation regarding a
merit salary increase for his sibling; and if the city commissioner
participates in such a deliberation, he may be found to have violated the
statute. Additionally, we conclude that other city commissioners would not
violate section 573.084 of the Government Code, which makes a violation of
section 573.062(b) a criminal offense, by merely voting on a merit salary
increase for a fellow city commissioner's sibling even after they were involved
in the deliberation in which the fellow city commissioner participated. We
cannot and do not resolve whether or not any person has actually violated
section 573.062(b) because such a determination would require the investigation
and resolution of fact questions, which cannot be done in the opinion process.
See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. Nos. JC-0307 (2000) at 1; JC-0184
(2000) at 4.
To provide a legal context for your questions, we review the
relevant provisions of chapter 573. Section 573.041 of the Government Code
provides that a public official "may not appoint, confirm the appointment of,
vote for the appointment or confirmation of the appointment of an individual to
a position" compensated from public funds if the individual is related to the
public official or to another member of the appointing board "within the third
degree by consanguinity or within the second degree by affinity." Tex. Gov't
Code Ann. §§ 573.002, .041 (Vernon 1994). Siblings are related to each other in
the second degree by consanguinity, see id.§§ 573.022,
.023(c)(2), and are thus within the degree of relationship affected by section
573.041, see id.§ 573.041.
The section 573.041 nepotism prohibition does not apply to a
relative continuously employed in a particular position for a specified period
of time immediately before the election or appointment of the public official
to whom the employee is related. See id.§ 573.062(a). The
continuously employed relative may retain his or her position. See
id.; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. DM-2 (1991) at
3 (city council member's brother would retain job if he served for requisite
time before election or appointment); Tex. Att'y Gen. LO-95-015, at 2 (mayor's
wife may retain position in which she had been employed before her husband's
election). But if an individual continues in a position under this exception,
the public official to whom the individual is related in the prohibited degree
may not participate in any deliberation or voting on the
appointment, reappointment, confirmation of the appointment or reappointment,
employment, reemployment, change in status, compensation, or
dismissal of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial