Nyreen v. Industrial Custom Prods., 042399 MNWC,

Case DateApril 23, 1999
CourtMinnesota
DONNA M. NYREEN, Employee,
v.
INDUSTRIAL CUSTOM PRODS. and ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., Employer-Insurer/Appellants.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
April 23, 1999
         HEADNOTES          APPORTIONMENT - EQUITABLE; CALCULATION OF BENEFITS - CONCURRENT BENEFITS. Kirchner I and II are inapplicable and do not require the employer and insurer to continue payment of temporary partial disability benefits when the employee's second and totally disabling injury is a work-related injury subject to another state's law and is not compensable under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act.          PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - EXPEDITED HEARING. The compensation judge erred by considering the employee's earning capacity at an expedited discontinuance hearing where that issue was not raised by the NOID and there was no agreement, as required by Minn. Stat. § 176.238, subd. 6, to expand the issues.          Reversed in part and vacated in part.           Determined by Wilson, J., Pederson, J., and Hefte, J.           Compensation Judge: William R. Johnson.           OPINION           DEBRA A. WILSON, Judge          The employer and insurer appeal from the compensation judge's decision that the employee is entitled to continuing temporary partial disability benefits following the employee's totally disabling Wisconsin work injury and from the judge's decision as to the employee's earning capacity following her return to work after the Wisconsin injury. We reverse in part and vacate in part.          BACKGROUND          On October 30, 1991, the employee sustained a work-related low back injury in the course and scope of her employment at Industrial Custom Products [the employer]. Her weekly wage at the time was $418.00. The employee subsequently underwent several surgical procedures to her low back, and the employer and insurer paid various Minnesota workers' compensation benefits, including medical benefits, temporary total disability benefits, and permanent partial disability benefits.1 Notice of maximum medical improvement [MMI] with regard to the 1991 injury was served and filed in August of 1997, and there is apparently no dispute that the employee reached MMI at that time.          On October 27, 1997, the employee began a valet parking attendant job, at a wage loss, at the St. Croix Casino in Wisconsin, and the employer and insurer commenced payment of temporary partial disability benefits based on reported casino earnings of $222.40 a week. Subsequently, on May 27, 1998, the employee sustained an injury to her knee while performing her duties at the casino. Her physician took her off work "due to knee ligament strain," and St. Croix Casino and its workers' compensation insurer began paying temporary total disability benefits, under Wisconsin law, based on a weekly wage of $222.40. On July 4, 1998, the employee returned to modified sedentary work at the casino, earning less than she had before because of slow business. The employer and insurer apparently continued paying temporary partial disability benefits but on July 15, 1998, filed a Notice of Intention to Discontinue Benefits [NOID], requesting discontinuance of temporary partial disability benefits effective May 27, 1998, on the following grounds:
The employee is no longer working due to a superseding, intervening cause of disability. She is not entitled to payment of temporary partial disability benefits when she is not working, generating an income and generating an income at a wage loss in relation to our date of injury.
         The employee filed an objection to discontinuance the following day, and the matter was set for expedited hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 176.238, subd. 6.          The discontinuance hearing was held before a compensation judge of the Office of Administrative Hearings on September 15, 1998. At that time, the employer and insurer reiterated their position that the Wisconsin injury was an intervening, superseding cause of the employee's disability and claimed that no temporary partial disability benefits were payable until the employee had been released to work at her usual valet parking attendant job without restrictions associated with her knee injury. The employee claimed entitlement to continuing temporary partial...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT