Padilla v. Prestige Fence & Landscape Co., 121018 IDWC, IC 2012-031446

Case DateDecember 10, 2018
CourtIdaho
SENOBIO PADILLA, Claimant,
v.
PRESTIGE FENCE & LANDSCAPE CO, Employer,
and
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Surety, Defendants.
No. IC 2012-031446
Idaho Workers Compensation
Before The Industrial Commission of The State of Idaho
December 10, 2018
          ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND VACATING DISMISSAL           Thomas E. Limbaugh, Chairman          On October 10, 2018, the Industrial Commission filed a notice of intent to recommend dismissal without prejudice due to case inactivity. The Commission notified Claimant that he was expected to respond within twenty-one (21) days with an explanation why this case should not be dismissed. On November 15, 2018, the Commission issued an order dismissing Claimant's complaint, which was premised on Claimant's failure to respond to its notice of intent to recommend dismissal. Thereafter, on November 19, 2018, Claimant's attorney filed a motion for reconsideration, affidavit, and brief. On November 23, 2018, Claimant's attorney filed a supplemental affidavit and addendum to his brief. Claimant's attorney explained his office procedures in detail and stated that in this specific case, through inadvertence or mistake, Claimant's attorney did not follow that procedure and therefore Claimant's attorney never saw the notice of intent to recommend dismissal or his assistant's draft response to same. Claimant's attorney requests the Commission withdraw the motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to retain the case on active status. Defendants did not file a response.          A decision of the Commission, in the absence of fraud, shall be final and conclusive as to all matters adjudicated, provided that within 20 days from the date of the filing of the decision, any party may move for reconsideration. Idaho Code § 72-718. However, "[i]t is axiomatic that a claimant must present to the Commission new reasons factually and legally to support a hearing on her Motion for Rehearing/Reconsideration rather than rehashing evidence previously presented." Curtis v. M.H. King Co., 142 Idaho 383, 388, 128 P.3d 920 (2005).          On reconsideration, the Commission will examine the evidence in the case and determine whether the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT