Palcich v. USX Corp., 042099 MNWC,

Case DateApril 20, 1999
CourtMinnesota
JOHN A. PALCICH, Employee,
v.
USX CORP., SELF-INSURED, Employer/Appellant.
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals
April 20, 1999
         HEADNOTES          PERMANENT PARTIAL DISABILITY - SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. The compensation judge's old law rating of permanent partial disability for the employee's 1978 work injury is supported by substantial evidence and is not clearly erroneous.          Affirmed.           Determined by: Hefte, J., Wilson, J., and Pederson, J.           Compensation Judge: Donald C. Erickson           OPINION           RICHARD C. HEFTE, Judge          The self-insured employer appeals from the compensation judge's finding that the employee sustained a 75% permanent partial disability rating to his right upper extremity as a result of the employee's work injury which occurred in 1978. We affirm.          BACKGROUND          John A. Palcich, the employee, has been employed by USX Corporation, the self-insured employer, for some 27 years. On September 7, 1978, the employee suffered an admitted work-related right shoulder and arm injury. At the time of his injury the employee worked as a pit laborer in a warehouse of the employer doing repeated lifting, especially overhead work. The employee sustained a severe dislocation of his right shoulder as a result of his work injury.          On October 10, 1978 the employee underwent right shoulder reconstruction surgery. Following his recovery from surgery, the employee was assigned to work in the employer's electrical department. Dr. E. Harvey O'Phelan reported in 1991 that the employee "continued to work although it was necessary for him to perform lighter duties." The employee testified that after his work injury he could not return to his pre-injury job. The employee's post-injury job was "scaled down" so that the employee's main duties were the sorting of small packages and keeping logs of supplies on a computer. In this job he lifted smaller objects and was able to get help from his fellow workers with the lifting of larger items. The employee admits that the self-insured employer accommodated his work duties due to his injury after his surgery and that he was able to work full time. Based on the disability schedules in effect as of the date of the employee's injury, the employee was initially paid workers' compensation benefits for a 15% permanent partial disability rating of the right arm. Later, based on a 1991 independent medical examination by Dr. Litman, the employee was paid benefits for an additional 20% rating, or a total of 35%, for his right arm and shoulder disability.          The employee testified he has pain in his shoulder and arm every day. He testified that his shoulder dislocates two or three times a year. This is accompanied by increased pain, as well as swelling and numbness down the employee's right arm. The employee is able to reduce these dislocations himself by laying on his back and making circular motions with his arm until he gets his shoulder back into the socket. The employee testified that he is unable to lift with his right arm. He is only able to use his right arm by positioning his left...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT