Professional Financial Services v. Gordon, 031221 KYWC, 201392143

Case DateMarch 12, 2021
CourtKentucky
PROFESSIONAL FINANCIAL SERVICES PETITIONER
v.
SERENA GORDON AND HON. R. ROLAND CASE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE RESPONDENTS
No. 201392143
Kentucky Workers Compensation
Commonwealth of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Board
March 12, 2021
         APPEAL FROM HON. R. ROLAND CASE, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.           COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: LMS HON STEVEN D GOODRUM HON IAN M GODFREY           COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: LMS HON PAULA RICHARDSON BARBER           BEFORE: ALVEY, Chairman, STIVERS and BORDERS, Members.          OPINION AFFIRMING           ALVEY, Chairman.          Professional Financial Services (“PFS”) appeals from the November 9, 2020 Opinion on Remand, and the December 20, 2020 Order denying its Petition for Reconsideration rendered by Hon. R. Roland Case, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). The ALJ found Serena Gordon (“Gordon”) was engaged in an activity benefitting her employer when she tripped and fell on a crumbling sidewalk on February 25, 2013. The ALJ therefore determined her injuries are work-related, and he reiterated his previous award of temporary total disability (“TTD”) benefits, permanent partial disability (“PPD”) benefits, and medical benefits.          On appeal, PFS argues substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s determination regarding an exception to the “Coming and Going” rule. PFS also argues the ALJ failed to provide sufficient findings of fact or analysis of law. We find the ALJ’s decision on remand for additional analysis regarding the compensability of Gordon’s claim due to the “benefit to the employer” exception of the “Coming and Going” rule is minimally sufficient; therefore, we affirm.          Gordon filed a Form 101 on October 2, 2015 alleging injuries to her left knee, ankle, and foot on February 25, 2013 when she twisted her left leg as she stepped from a curb while going to her car. At the time she filed her claim, Gordon was a resident of Lexington, Kentucky. Her work history reflects she has worked in automobile sales, financing, and management. At the time of the accident, she was the branch manager for PFS, an automobile financing company. We will not review the medical evidence since it has no bearing on the issues raised on appeal.          In his decisions rendered in 2016 and 2020, the ALJ determined PFS did not own, operate, control or maintain the parking lot where the accident occurred. The ALJ also determined Gordon was not required to park in a specific spot or area in the parking lot. The ALJ therefore determined the parking lot was not part of the employer’s operating premises. We will not address that determination since it was not appealed.          In the October 5, 2016 Opinion, Award, and Order, the ALJ found Gordon sustained compensable work-related injuries on February 25, 2013. He found the activity of retrieving her tablet provided some benefit to the employer, and therefore found the exception to the “Coming and Going” rule applicable. This Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision in an Opinion dated March 31, 2017. The Court of Appeals affirmed this Board in a decision rendered June 8, 2018. The Kentucky Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in Professional Financial Services v. Serena Gordon, 2018-SC-000363-WC (June 13, 2019) (Designated Not To Be Published). That decision specifically directed the ALJ to make additional determinations as follows:
The ALJ did not make any findings as to exactly when Gordon’s activities became for the “benefit of the employer” and when they ceased. And the ALJ’s reliance on one case for the general rule that workers’ compensation coverage can cover injuries sustained outside an employer’s operating premises is insufficient to resolve the issue at bar, as demonstrated by the analysis in the Board’s majority opinion. While we do not opine whether Gordon’s injury is compensable, we do remand for the ALJ to perform an appropriate analysis and to make a determination supported by the record.
         Gordon testified by deposition on December 21, 2015, and at the hearing held June 17, 2016. Gordon began working for PFS, an automobile financing company, in March 2007. As branch manager, she spent approximately seventy percent of her time in the office. She spent the remainder of her time attending automobile auctions, visiting dealerships, and collecting accounts.          On February 25, 2013, Gordon was working late to catch up on collections because it was nearly the end of the month. Upon reaching her car, Gordon realized she had left behind the tablet PFS provided for her to use while out of the office. She returned to her office, got the tablet and returned to her car. When she stepped off the curb prior to entering her car, she rolled her left ankle causing her to fall.          Nat Reider (“Reider”), the regional manager for PFS, testified by deposition on February 3, 2016. Reider testified branch managers, like Gordon, may take tablets home with them to conduct business. Branch managers are on call to dealerships in order to process credit applications. It is not unusual to take tablets home for this purpose. Reider acknowledged approximately thirty percent of a branch manager’s time is spent in the field, which includes visiting dealerships and collecting payments from individuals.          Jason Scott Claypool (“Claypool”), current branch manager for PFS in Lexington, testified by deposition on April 12, 2016. He was Gordon’s assistant manager when she was the branch manager. He testified that as branch manager he has the option to take a tablet home with him, as did Gordon when she was branch manager. He stated he tries to complete all of his work before he goes home.          In the decision rendered November 9, 2020, the ALJ determined as verbatim follows:
In the case at hand, the Plaintiff had returned to her office to retrieve a tablet, which was issued to her by the Defendant-employer for the sole purpose of the Plaintiff working from home. The Plaintiff testified the tablet could not be used for any other purpose rather than work. After retrieving the tablet form her office the Plaintiff slipped and fell on her way back to her vehicle.
         The claimant, Serena Gordon, in her discovery deposition at pages 22 and 23 testified to-wit:
Q. Well, just kind of walk me
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT