Public Service Company of New Hampshire, 101816 NHPUC, 25, 954

Case DateOctober 18, 2016
CourtNew Hampshire
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE d/b/a EVERSOURCE ENERGY
ORDER No. 25, 954
No. DE 16-817
New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission
October 18, 2016
         Auction of Electric Generation Facilities Order Denying Joint Motion to Designate Staff           Martin P. Honigberg, Chairman          I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY          This docket considers the auction design and related recommendations put forward by the Commission's auction advisor, J.P. Morgan ("JPM"), for the divestiture of the generation assets of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource Energy ("Eversource"). A procedural schedule for this proceeding was established by an Order of Notice issued on September 7, 2016. The City of Berlin and the Town of Gorham were granted intervention by the Commission at the prehearing conference for this docket. On September 30, Berlin and Gorham (together, the "Moving Parties") filed joint written comments regarding the JPM auction design proposal, which included a request that the Commission designate General Counsel Anne Ross and Electric Division Director Thomas Frantz as Staff Advocates pursuant to RSA 363:32, II. On October 4, the Commission issued a secretarial letter indicating that the Moving Parties' request would be treated as a motion to designate Staff, with an invitation for parties to respond by October 6, 2016.           II. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES          A. Berlin and Gorham          The Moving Parties' comments regarding the JPM auction design included the following statement: "Finally, [Berlin and Gorham] respectfully request that Attorney Ross and Mr. Frantz be designated as 'Staff Advocates' pursuant to RSA 363:32 (II) as was the case in the Divestiture Docket." Moving Parties' Comments, September 30, 2016, at 14. That was the full extent of the Moving Parties' argument.          B. Eversource          Eversource filed the only objection. Eversource's objection identified a number of problems with the Moving Parties' request, including: a lack of factual allegations supporting designation; the Moving Parties' past assent to the 2016...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT