Rezac v. Oliver Homes, LLC, 091407 NEWC, 1117

Case DateSeptember 14, 2007
CourtNebraska
DAVID REZAC, Plaintiff,
v.
OLIVER HOMES, LLC, Defendant.
No. 1117
DOC 206
Nebraska Workers Compensation
September 14, 2007
          Timothy S. Dowd, Attorney at Law           Justin High Ronald E. Frank, Attorneys at Law           ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE AND REMAND ON REVIEW          This matter came on for a review hearing before the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court at Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, on September 11, 2007, on the application for review of the defendant filed April 26, 2007, alleging error in the award entered on April 18, 2007, by Judge James R. Coe, and upon the written briefs and oral arguments of the parties.          I.           The first error alleged by the defendant is that Judge Coe erred in determining that the plaintiff was temporarily partially disabled from April 24, 2006, to the date of hearing on March 13, 2007, and would continue to be temporarily partially disabled. There is an opinion from Dr. Christopher Ihle, expressed January 15, 2007, that the plaintiff had not yet attained maximum medical improvement. The doctor had earlier expressed the opinion that the plaintiff was going to require a distal claviculectomy which has not yet been performed. Furthermore, there is evidence that Dr. Ihle imposed restrictions upon the use of the plaintiff’s right arm and there is no evidence that those restrictions have been lifted or altered. While it is true that the plaintiff was able to secure employment one week after his employment with the defendant was ended, the plaintiff works fewer hours and at a lesser rate of pay. In the case Frauendorfer v. Lindsay Mfg. Co. Inc., 263 Neb. 237, 639 N.W.2d 125 (2002), Mr. Frauendorfer was able to return to work with his same employer, but at fewer hours and a reduced rate of pay. An award of temporary partial disability to Mr. Frauendorfer until such time as he attained maximum medical improvement was affirmed. The difference in this case is that Mr. Rezac is working for a new employer. The review panel finds that Judge Coe was not clearly wrong in finding the plaintiff to have been temporarily partially disabled since April 24, 2006. The review panel does note, however...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT