Robertson v. Vernon Steel, Inc., 101119 IDWC, IC 2018-001726

Case DateOctober 11, 2019
CourtIdaho
DELIA ROBERTSON, Claimant,
v.
VERNON STEEL, INC., Employer,
And
IDAHO STATE INSURANCE FUND, Surety, Defendants.
IC 2018-001726
Idaho Workers Compensation
Before the Industrial Commission of the State of Idaho
October 11, 2019
          ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND VACATING DISMISSAL           Thomas P. Baskin, Chairman.          On August 23, 2019, the Industrial Commission filed a notice of intent to recommend dismissal without prejudice due to case inactivity. The Commission notified Claimant that he was expected to respond within twenty-one (21) days with an explanation why this case should not be dismissed. On September 30, 2019, the Commission issued an order dismissing Claimant’s complaint, which was premised on Claimant’s failure to respond to its notice of intent to recommend dismissal. Thereafter, on October 3, 2019, Claimant’s Attorney argued that he drafted a responsive memorandum to the notice of intent to recommend dismissal, but learned the same was not filed when he received the Commission’s dismissal. Claimant’s motion is construed as a request for reconsideration. Defendants did not file a response. Claimant submitted documentation that his response included the Commission on the certificate of service.          A decision of the Commission, in the absence of fraud, shall be final and conclusive as to all matters adjudicated, provided that within 20 days from the date of the filing of the decision, any party may move for reconsideration. Idaho Code § 72-718. However, “[i]t is axiomatic that a claimant must present to the Commission new reasons factually and legally to support a hearing on her Motion for Rehearing/Reconsideration rather than rehashing evidence previously presented.” Curtis v. M.H. King Co., 142 Idaho 383, 388, 128 P.3d 920 (2005).          On reconsideration, the Commission will examine the evidence in the case and determine whether the evidence presented supports the legal conclusions. The Commission is not compelled to make findings on the facts of the case during reconsideration. Davidson v. H.H. Keim Co., Ltd., 110 Idaho 758, 718 P.2d 1196 (1986). The Commission may reverse its decision upon a motion for...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT