Sanchez-Rivera v. Swift Pork Co., 103118 MNWC, WC18-6182

Case DateOctober 31, 2018
CourtMinnesota
BALDOMERO SANCHEZ-RIVERA, Employee/Appellant,
v.
SWIFT PORK CO. and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MGMT. SERVS., INC., Employer-Insurer/Respondents
and
PRAIRIE REHAB. SERVS., INC., SANFORD HEALTH, CORE ORTHOPEDICS, JOHN PETERSON, and AVERA MED. GROUP, Intervenors.
No. WC18-6182
Minnesota Workers Compensation
Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals
October 31, 2018
         CAUSATION – SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE. Substantial evidence, including medical records, lay testimony and expert medical opinion, supported the compensation judge’s findings denying the employee’s Gillette injury claims.           Robert M. Maus, Baudler, Maus, Forman & King, LLP, Austin, Minnesota, for the Appellant.           William G. Laak, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet, Miller & Laak, Bloomington, Minnesota, for the Respondents.           Determined by: Deborah K. Sundquist, Judge, David A. Stofferahn, Judge, Gary M. Hall, Judge.           Compensation Judge: Danny P. Kelly          Affirmed.           OPINION           DEBORAH K. SUNDQUIST, Judge.          The employee appeals the compensation judge’s denial of wage loss, medical, and vocational rehabilitation benefits. Substantial evidence supports the compensation judge’s findings and we, therefore, affirm.          BACKGROUND          Baldomero Sanchez-Rivera arrived in Baltimore, Maryland from Guatemala in 2004 with limited proficiency in English, few vocational skills, and minimal education. After working in jobs installing siding and laying carpet, the employee moved to Minnesota and found a job in 2010 with Swift Pork Co./JBS, the employer. He passed a pre-employment physical and was hired. He had no history of upper extremity medical treatment or injury.          The employee worked primarily boxing meat. The job required him to assemble boxes of meat on a roller table which was waist high. Using tape and other materials, he made a box and placed a pound of ice in it. Meat was then machine loaded into the box. The employee placed another pound of ice over the meat and slid the box across the roller table to the scale. The employee would add meat to the box until the box weighed 63 pounds. He sealed the box with tape and carried it to a nearby pallet on which he stacked the 63-pound boxes to a lift height of 48 inches. Working a daily shift of between eight and nine hours, the employee handled 170 to 180 boxes each day.          On July 27, 2016, the employee claimed a cumulative trauma injury to his bilateral forearms, heels, and right shoulder while doing his regular job. There was no specific injury identified. The First Report of Injury indicates that the employee gave notice to the employer on the same day.          The employee sought treatment with Charles O. Dike, M.D. at Sanford Clinic on August 8, 2016, complaining of work-related right shoulder pain which began three weeks prior. Within a few weeks, the employee saw orthopedic surgeon Travis R. Liddell, M.D. and complained of bilateral shoulder and elbow pain. He saw Dr. Dike in a follow up appointment in September 2016 and received work restrictions limiting his use of the right arm above the shoulder for one month.          In November 2016, the employee underwent an MRI of the shoulders which showed, among other conditions, partial thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon bilaterally, subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis, and a SLAP tear on...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT