Santiago v. Brown University In Providence In State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, 020420 RIWC, 2014-02664

Case DateFebruary 04, 2020
CourtRhode Island
CARLOTA M. SANTIAGO
v.
BROWN UNIVERSITY IN PROVIDENCE IN THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
W.C.C. 2014-02664
Rhode Island Worker Compensation
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Providence
February 4, 2020
         FINAL DECREE OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION          This matter came on to be heard by the Appellate Division upon the claim of appeal of the petitioner/employee and upon consideration thereof, the employee's appeal is denied and dismissed, and it is hereby          ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:          That the findings of fact and orders contained in a decree of this Court entered on October 20, 2016 be, and they hereby are, affirmed.          PER ORDER:          Nicholas DiFilippo, Administrator          DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION           OLSSON, J. This matter is before the Appellate Division on the employee's appeal from the decision and decree of the trial judge denying the employee's original petition in which she alleged that she sustained work-related injuries to her back, right leg, and right hip on June 8, 2012, resulting in a period of total or partial incapacity from October 29, 2012 to November 25, 2012. After a thorough review of the record and consideration of the arguments of both parties, we find no error on the part of the trial judge and deny the employee's appeal.          With the assistance of an interpreter, Carlota M. Santiago (the employee) testified that she worked for Brown University (the employer) as a custodian. Her position involved stripping and cleaning floors, buffing the floors, and washing the rugs. She explained that on June 8, 2012, she was using the buffing machine, but it was not working properly and would only run for a couple of minutes and then stop. To restart the machine, she had to reach down and press a button located on the lower right side of the machine. When the employee pressed the button, the machine started up and swung towards her and hit her right foot. She said she immediately felt pain in her right foot and right hip and reported the incident to her supervisor. The employee testified that she did not immediately seek medical treatment for this alleged injury and continued to work full-time at her regular job. She did take some time off from work from June 28,2012 until mid-August due to some issues with a co-worker.          The employee eventually went to Concentra Medical Center (Concentra) at the employer's direction for complaints of ongoing back pain since the alleged incident and because she was limping. She explained that she stopped attending physical therapy after she completed seven (7) sessions because the employer stopped paying and she could not afford the co-pay of Fifteen and 00/100 ($15.00) Dollars for each visit. She then began treatment with Dr. David LaCharite, She stated that the pain she felt in her lower back and right hip became too much, so she did not work from October 29,2012 through November 25,2012. The employee returned to her regular full-time job after the four (4) week break and has continued to work despite ongoing back pain.          The employee acknowledged that she saw her primary care physician, Dr. Hugo Yamada, on June 20, 2012, twelve (12) days after the alleged incident. She asserted that she reported the work incident to him and the doctor told her she needed to see the workers'...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT