Shivers v. Silver Bay Seafoods, LLC, 012621 AKWC, 21-0007

Case DateJanuary 26, 2021
CourtAlaska
EDDIE SHIVERS, Employee, Claimant,
v.
SILVER BAY SEAFOODS, LLC, Employer,
and
LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Insurer, Defendants.
AWCB Decision No. 21-0007
AWCB No. 201913896
Alaska Workers Compensation Board
January 26, 2021
         INTERLOCUTORY DECISION AND ORDER           Ronald P. Ringel, Designated Chair          An issue related to the Eddie Shivers’ June 9, 2020 petition for a second independent medical evaluation (SIME) was heard in Anchorage, Alaska on January 13, 2021, a date selected on November 18, 2020. An October 22, 2020 affidavit of readiness for hearing gave rise to this hearing. Attorney Patricia Huna appeared and represented Eddie Shivers (Employee) who appeared and testified. Attorney Jeffrey Holloway appeared and represented Silver Bay Seafoods, LLC and Liberty Insurance Corporation (Employer). There were no other witnesses. The record closed at the hearing’s conclusion on January 13, 2021.          ISSUE          The parties previously agreed to an in-person SIME. Employee contends he is willing to travel to an out-of-state SIME despite the COVID-19 pandemic, and he asks that the SIME be ordered to proceed. Employer states it might be liable if Employee contracted COVID-19 while traveling to the SIME and the cost of complying with travel restrictions is too high; it contends the risk is too great and asks that the SIME be postponed until the risk has decreased.          Should an in-person SIME be ordered?          FINDINGS OF FACT          A preponderance of the evidence establishes the following facts and factual conclusions:          1) On October 6, 2019, Employee slipped and fell while working in a freezer. (First Report of Occupational Injury, October 8 2010).          2) On June 29, 2020, the parties filed an SIME form, stipulating that there were disagreements between Employee’s doctors and Employer’s medical evaluator as to the cause and compensability of Employee’s disability, the need for medical treatment, and other issues including functional capacity. The parties agreed the SIME should be conducted by an orthopedist. (SIME Form, June 29, 2020).          3) Employee lives in Phoenix, Arizona. (Record).          4) The Board’s list of SIME doctors includes fifteen orthopedists. Six practice in California, five in Hawaii, three in Oregon, and one in Washington. None of the orthopedists on the Board’s list of SIME doctors perform evaluations in Arizona. (Bulletin 20-06, November 4, 2020)          5) On August 13, 2020, the division issued Bulletin 20-02 (Revised) regarding travel to SIMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The bulletin noted the United States Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommended high risk individuals avoid nonessential air travel. The bulletin stated that travel to out-of-state SIMEs was suspended for high risk individuals. The bulletin also stated that if an injured work was not at high risk and all parties agreed, travel to SIMEs could proceed. The bulletin does not address cases in which an injured worker is not at high risk but the parties do not agree on travel to the evaluation. (Bulletin 20-02 (Revised), August 13, 2020).          6) At the October 22, 2020 prehearing conference, Employee’s attorney stated Employee was willing to accept the additional risk of travel to an SIME during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employer’s attorney stated Employer was not willing to accept the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT