Sitler, 031517 WVAGO, AGO 031517

Case DateMarch 15, 2017
CourtWest Virginia
Honorable George V. Sitler
AGO 031517
No. 031517
West Virginia Attorney General Opinions
State of West Virginia Office of the Attorney General
March 15, 2017
          Patrick Morrisey Attorney General           Elbert Lin Solicitor General          Honorable George V. Sitler          Prosecuting Attorney of Mercer County          Mercer County Courthouse Annex          120 Scott Street, Suite 200          Princeton, West Virginia 24740          Dear Prosecutor Sitler:          You have asked for an Opinion of the Attorney General regarding sex-segregated athletic programs. This Opinion is being issued pursuant to West Virginia Code § 5-3-2, which provides that the Attorney General "may consult with and advise the several prosecuting attorneys in matters relating to the official duties of their office." To the extent this Opinion relies on facts, it is based solely upon the factual assertions set forth in your correspondence with the Office of the Attorney General.          According to your letter, a question has arisen concerning student participation in the softball team at Pikeview High School. You explain that the Mercer County Schools sponsor several sex-segregated sports programs. Football and baseball have "[traditionally" been "male sports," whereas "[s]oft ball has always been treated as a females-only sport." The letter states that "[a] male student, who exhibits some nontraditional gender-identity traits (makeup, skirts, etc.)[,] has signed up and announced his intention to try out for" the softball team.          Your letter raises the following legal question:
May a school prohibit a male student with nontraditional gender-identity traits from participating in a traditional girls-only sports program and still comply with Title IX?
         Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 "marked a momentous shift for women's equality in classrooms, on playing fields, and in communities throughout our nation."1 The federal law provides that "[n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a). And in a 1975 regulation implementing Title IX, the federal government interpreted the law to prohibit discrimination "on the basis of sex" in athletic programs. 34 C.F.R. § 106.41(b).[2]          Under Title IX regulations, a federally funded school may provide "separate teams for members of each sex," provided that certain conditions are satisfied. Id. The federal regulation applying Title IX to athletic programs specifically permits "separate teams for members of each sex where selection for such teams is based upon competitive skill or the activity involved is a contact sport." Id. There is an exception for the circumstance "where a [funding] recipient operates or sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex but operates or sponsors no such team for members of the other sex, and athletic opportunities for members of that sex have previously been limited." Id. In that case, "members of the excluded sex must be allowed to try-out for the team offered unless the sport involved is a contact sport." Id. Contact sports are defined to include "boxing, wrestling, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact." Id. More generally, a funding recipient must provide "equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes"—a mandate evaluated by many factors, such as the provision of equipment and supplies, the scheduling of games and practice time, and the assignment and compensation of coaches. Id. § 106.41(b).3          Applying these principles, we believe that under appropriate circumstances, a school could restrict participation in Softball to females only without running afoul of Title IX. As stated in the U.S. Department of Education's 1979 Policy Interpretation, "where an institution sponsors a team in a particular sport for members of one sex, it may be required either to permit the excluded sex to try out for the team or to sponsor a separate team for the previously excluded sex." 44 Fed.Reg. at 71,418. The answer to that question turns on facts beyond those presented in your letter. For example, whether softball is a contact sport as defined by...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT