Stanger v. Idaho State University, 110518 IDWC, IC 2013-015556

Case DateNovember 05, 2018
CourtIdaho
ROBIN STANGER, Claimant,
v.
IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY, Employer,
and
STATE INSURANCE FUND, Surety,
and
STATE OF IDAHO, INDUSTRIAL SPECIAL INDEMNITY FUND, Defendants.
NO. IC 2013-015556
Idaho Workers Compensation
Before The Industrial Commission of The State of Idaho
November 5, 2018
          FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND RECOMMENDATION           Thomas E. Limbaugh, Chairman          INTRODUCTION          Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-506, the Idaho Industrial Commission assigned the above-entitled matter to Referee Alan Taylor, who conducted a hearing in Pocatello on October 17, 2017. Claimant, Robin Stanger, was present in person and represented by James C. Arnold, of Idaho Falls and Kent A. Higgins, of Pocatello. Defendant Employer, Idaho State University (ISU), and Defendant Surety, State Insurance Fund, were represented by Steven R. Fuller, of Preston. Defendant, State of Idaho, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund (ISIF), was represented by Anthony M. Valdez, of Twin Falls. The parties presented oral and documentary evidence. Post-hearing depositions were taken and briefs were later submitted. The matter came under advisement on August 28, 2018.          ISSUES          The issues to be decided were narrowed in briefing and are:[1]
1. The extent of Claimant’s permanent impairment and the portion thereof attributable to her industrial accident.
2. Whether Claimant is totally and permanently disabled pursuant to the odd-lot doctrine or otherwise.
3. Whether the Industrial Special Indemnity Fund is liable under Idaho Code § 72-332.
4. Apportionment under the Carey Formula.
         Employer/Surety have briefed the issue of whether Claimant’s claim for permanent disability is precluded by Idaho Code § 72-435 because Claimant engaged in the allegedly unreasonable practice of declining surgery, specifically, bilateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This issue was not mentioned in Claimant’s Request for Calendaring filed October 3, 2016 after joinder of ISIF, Claimant’s Amended Request for Calendaring filed October 7, 2016, or her Second Amended Request for Calendaring filed October 27, 2016. This issue was not listed in ISIF’s Response to Claimant’s Request for Calendaring filed October 20, 2016. The document entitled “Response to Amended Request for Calendaring,” dated October 21, 2016, and attached to Employer/Surety’s Objection to Claimant’s Reply Brief filed August 31, 2018, is not contained in the Commission’s legal file and was apparently not received by the Commission.[2]Consequently, whether Claimant is precluded from claiming permanent disability for failure to follow prescribed medical treatment was not listed as an issue in the Commission’s November 2, 2016 Notice of Hearing, May 9, 2017 Order Vacating and Resetting Hearing, June 15, 2017 Amended Order Vacating and Resetting Hearing, or August 7, 2017 Second Amended Order Vacating and Resetting Hearing. Pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-713, it cannot be addressed herein.[3]          CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES          Claimant asserts she is 100% totally and permanently disabled or is an odd-lot worker. Employer/Surety assert that Claimant has failed to prove she is totally and permanently disabled due to her 2013 industrial injury and also assert that if Claimant is found to be totally and permanently disabled, it is due to the combined effects of her industrial accident and pre-existing permanent impairment for which ISIF bears responsibility. ISIF maintains that Claimant’s preexisting condition was not a hindrance or obstacle to her employment and that her 2013 accident does not combine with her preexisting condition to render her totally and permanently disabled asserting that prior to her accident Claimant worked without restrictions and was fully able to function.          EVIDENCE CONSIDERED          The record in this matter consists of the following:          1. The Industrial Commission legal file;          2. The parties’ joint exhibits A through R;          3. The post-hearing deposition testimony of Richard Wathne, M.D., taken by Claimant on December 19, 2017;          4. The post-hearing deposition testimony of Kathy Gammon, CRC, MSPT, taken by Claimant on January 30, 2018; and          5. The post-hearing deposition testimony of Sara Statz, CRC, taken by Employer/Surety on March 2, 2018.          All outstanding objections are overruled and motions to strike are denied except as noted below. Employer/Surety’s objection to Claimant’s Reply Brief is overruled pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-713 for the reasons set forth above. Employer/Surety’s Motion to Strike Claimant’s Response to Objection to Claimant’s Reply Brief, filed September 12, 2018, in which ISIF subsequently joined on September 21, 2018, is hereby granted only as to pages 3 through the paragraph entitled “CONCLUSION” at page 17 of Claimant’s response.          After having considered the above evidence and the arguments of the parties, the Referee submits the following findings of fact and conclusions of law for review by the Commission.          FINDINGS OF FACT          1. Background. Claimant was born in 1952 in Pocatello. She was 65 years old and resided in Pocatello at the time of the hearing. She is right-handed.          2. Claimant graduated from Pocatello High School in 1970. In high school she participated in gymnastics and Taekwondo. She eventually tested for and advanced to black belt proficiency. She completed a year of college but obtained no college degrees. Claimant has been actively involved in caring for, training, and riding horses most of her life. Between approximately 1970 and 2001, Claimant worked as a fast food server, stable attendant, hotel housekeeper, cake decorator, construction flagger, convenience store cashier, baker, animal control officer, security guard, bartender, dry cleaning attendant, and assisted living center administrator.          3. In approximately 2001, Claimant commenced working for Idaho State University as an office specialist and later as an archives record manager. She inventoried archived records, retrieved, organized, and re-shelved boxes of records and made a computer data base of the materials. She re-boxed materials into appropriate containers for long term storage. Claimant regularly transported boxes in her own vehicle for several miles and moved boxes alone and with assistance from others. Boxes often weighed from 40 to 50 pounds or more. She used ladders frequently to access higher shelves.          4. Prior conditions. On June 22, 2011, Claimant sought medical treatment for pain in her left shoulder, left knee, and right hip. Michael Doyle, PA-C, recorded her left shoulder symptoms included pain “which keeps her awake” and limited range of motion with abduction to “80-85 degrees, but she groans and moans while doing so.” Exhibit C, p. 9. Left shoulder x-rays showed significant calcification and she was diagnosed with likely calcific left rotator cuff tendonitis and given prednisone and Naprosyn. Thereafter she continued to seek medical treatment periodically for shoulder, knee, and hip symptoms.          5. On August 1, 2011, Claimant presented to Jami Price, PA-C, reporting pain in her shoulders. Exhibit C, p. 4.          6. In approximately October 2011, Claimant began treating with Ananda Walaliyadda, M.D., who diagnosed Claimant with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and chronic pain.          7. On October 3, 2011, David Brizee, D.O., recorded Claimant’s complaints of bilateral knee pain, right hip pain, and left shoulder pain. He noted calcification of her left shoulder tendons and considered referring her to a pain management specialist. Claimant was then taking a number of medications, including: Buprenorphine patch for shoulder pain; Ibuprofen 800 milligrams for knee, hip and shoulder pain; Meloxicam for arthritis, pain, swelling, and stiffness in her knee, hip, and shoulder; Baclofen for spasms and leg cramps; Simvastatin; and Hydroxychloroquine for arthritis and lupus. Exhibit A, p. 4. She was referred to Kevin Hill, M.D., for pain management.          8. On October 20, 2011, Dr. Hill examined Claimant and recorded her report of a six-month history of severe joint pain. He further recorded: “Crepitus noted in the right shoulder. Right shoulder shows forward flexion to approximately 90 degrees, shoulder abduction to 85 degrees, shoulder internal and external rotation decreased by 25% bilaterally.” Exhibit B, p. 2. He prescribed methadone, Celebrex, and Wellbutrin.          9. On August 23, 2012, Dr...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT