Stockman v. State, 072498 KYWC, BAK 123730

Case DateJuly 24, 1998
CourtCalifornia
DONALD STOCKMAN, Applicant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, legally uninsured, Defendant. Case
Nos. BAK 123730, BAK 123079, BAK 123080
California Workers Compensation Decisions
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board State Of California
July 24, 1998
         OPINION AND DECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION           J. WIEGAND          These cases involve a question arising under Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (h), which bars compensation for a psychiatric injury that is substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action. We granted reconsideration to further study the factual and legal issues presented. Having completed our study, we conclude that the workers' compensation referee ("WCR") correctly found that no compensation is payable because applicant's claimed psychiatric injury was substantially caused by a lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action.          BACKGROUND          Applicant was hired by the State of California, Department of Corrections, in December of 1991. In July of 1995, he was assigned to Wasco State Prison as an associate warden in charge of business services. Thereafter, a conflict developed which resulted in two opposing factions at the prison: Warden Carrillo and his supporters were on one side, and applicant and Chief Deputy Warden Pena, and their supporters, were on the other. Applicant assisted Pena in preparing a memorandum which referred to Carrillo's "bazaar (sic) vindictive management practices" and described Carrillo's behavior as "irrational, unprofessional and irresponsible." Also, applicant was concerned because he interpreted a statement by Warden Carrillo as a death threat after he reported the warden's conduct to his superiors in the Department of Corrections. Applicant's physical complaints included upset stomach, diarrhea, disturbed sleep, and impaired sexual function and interest.          On May 19, 1997, applicant was notified that he was being involuntarily transferred to Corcoran State Prison, approximately 47 miles from the Wasco prison, effective immediately. Chief Deputy Warden Pena also was transferred to a facility at Corcoran and Warden Carrillo was forced to retire.          Applicant filed three applications for adjudication, alleging specific injuries to the psyche on March 4, 1996, and May 19, 1997, and cumulative injury to the psyche from December 1991 through May 19, 19 97. The WCR found that the transfer to Corcoran prison was a lawful, non-discriminatory, good faith personnel action and that it was a substantial cause of applicant's psychiatric injury. Based on these findings, the WCR concluded that compensation was barred by section 3208.3, subdivision (h).          In his petition for reconsideration, applicant asserts (1) that his psychiatric injury was the result of cumulative trauma, (2) that the transfer to Corcoran State Prison on May 19, 1997, was not a substantial cause of his psychiatric disability, and (3) that the transfer from Wasco to Corcoran was not a lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel action.          DISCUSSION          Labor Code section 3208.3 was enacted as part of the Margolin-Bill Greene Workers' Compensation Reform Act of 1989 (Stats. 1989, ch. 8 92, § 25) which brought about extensive changes in the workers' compensation system. The statute specifies that "[i] t is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to establish a new and higher threshold of compensability for psychiatric injury under this division." All of the elements set forth in section 3208.3 must be satisfied in order to establish that applicant has sustained a compensable psychiatric injury. Those elements in controversy in the present matter will be individually discussed in the following sections.          Psychiatric Injury          Section 3208.3, subdivision (a), states:
"A psychiatric injury shall be compensable if it is a mental disorder which causes disability or need for medical treatment, and it is diagnosed pursuant to procedures promulgated under paragraph (4) of subdivision (j) of Section 139.2 or, until these procedures are promulgated, it is diagnosed using the terminology and criteria of the American Psychiatric Associations' Diagnostic and Statistical
...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT