Tapia v. Triton Investments, Inc., 113020 UTWC, 19-0869

Case DateNovember 30, 2020
CourtUtah
ARTURO TAPIA, Petitioner,
v.
TRITON INVESTMENTS, INC. and WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND, Respondents.
No. 19-0869
Utah Workers Compensation Decisions
Utah Labor Commission
November 30, 2020
         ORDER AFFIRMING ALJ’S DECISION           Jaceson R. Maughan, Utah Labor Commissioner.          Triton Investments, Inc. and its insurance carrier, Workers Compensation Fund, (collectively referred to as “Triton”) ask the Utah Labor Commission to review Administrative Law Judge Decker’s order dismissing without prejudice Mr. Tapia’s claim for benefits under the Utah Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 34A, Chapter 2, Utah Code Annotated.          The Labor Commission exercises jurisdiction over this motion for review pursuant to §63G-4-301 of the Utah Administrative Procedures Act and §34A-2-801(4) of the Utah Workers’ Compensation Act.          BACKGROUND AND ISSUES PRESENTED          Mr. Tapia filed an application for hearing claiming workers’ compensation benefits for an alleged injury he attributes to an accident on August 22, 2019, while he was working for Triton. Triton scheduled a medical examination for Mr. Tapia by its medical consultant, to which he objected before failing to attend. Judge Decker instructed Mr. Tapia to comply with the rescheduled examination, but he again failed to attend.          Triton then moved to dismiss Mr. Tapia’s claim with prejudice for failure to attend the medical examination as instructed. Mr. Tapia responded to Triton’s motion by filing his own motion for dismissal of his claim without prejudice while he pursued other causes of action regarding his injured status. Triton replied by arguing that dismissing Mr. Tapia’s claim without prejudice would be prejudicial to Triton in light of the costs it has expended in defending against the claim.          Judge Decker determined that Mr. Tapia’s claim should be dismissed without prejudice because such dismissal was consistent with a suspension of the claim done in previous Commission cases. Triton now seeks review of Judge Decker’s order by reiterating that dismissal of Mr. Tapia’s claim without prejudice is not appropriate...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT